2014
DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.494-501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging distance of Melipona subnitida Ducke (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

Abstract: Introduction Bees are primary pollinators in most regions of the world (Bawa, 1990; Silberbauer-Gottsberger & Gottsberger, 1988). Their flight range strongly influences the sexual reproduction of most flowering plants and can further determine the genetic structure of plant populations (Campbell, 1985; Waser et al., 1996). The distance that bees travel in search of a resource can directly affect agricultural crops, given that bee pollination is necessary to generate 30% of the human food supply (Slaa et al., 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, spatially explicit models for bee conservation and crop pollination services based on such data may be severely underestimating flight distance and dispersal capacity in stingless bees. As expected, there was a decrease in bee return rate with release distance and an increase on the duration of return (Table II), as observed for other bee species (Guédot et al 2009;Rodrigues and Ribeiro 2014;Silva et al 2014;Smith et al 2017;Campbell et al 2019). However, we found great variability in the return time of the foragers (Table II).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Therefore, spatially explicit models for bee conservation and crop pollination services based on such data may be severely underestimating flight distance and dispersal capacity in stingless bees. As expected, there was a decrease in bee return rate with release distance and an increase on the duration of return (Table II), as observed for other bee species (Guédot et al 2009;Rodrigues and Ribeiro 2014;Silva et al 2014;Smith et al 2017;Campbell et al 2019). However, we found great variability in the return time of the foragers (Table II).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous experiments on foraging distances in stingless bees have predominantly used either artificial feeders, where workers are trained to feed on and recruit to nectar feeders placed at increasing distance from the nest (Kuhn-Neto et al 2009;Silva et al 2014) or translocation ('homing') experiments, where captured bees are released at increasing distance from the nest (Roubik and Aluja 1983;Smith et al 2017). Results from these experiments demonstrate that 'maximum homing distances' in stingless bees are, as in other bee taxa, a function of overall body size (van Nieuwstadt and Ruano Iraheta 1996; Araújo et al 2004;Kuhn-Neto et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foi liberado um total de 180 abelhas pelo método de captura e recaptura de Roubik e Aluja (1983), durante o período de realização do estudo, assumindo que as abelhas que retornassem ao ninho, conheciam o caminho de volta, ou seja, já tinham voado as distâncias utilizadas no experimento. Para Silva et al (2014), o teste de captura e recaptura pode ser considerado eficaz, uma vez que as abelhas libertadas só precisam voar de volta para o ninho, entretanto, quando realizado em grandes distâncias as abelhas podem se perder no caminho de volta, por falta de familiaridade com o local de onde foram liberadas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified