2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00615.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging in nature: foraging efficiency and attentiveness in caterpillars with different diet breadths

Abstract: Abstract.  1. Seventy‐seven individual last‐instar caterpillars foraging in the field were examined for 6 h each. They represented four species of Arctiidae of similar size and habitat use. Two, Hypocrisias minima and Pygarctia roseicapitis, are specialists restricted to particular plant genera. The other two, Grammia geneura and Estigmene acrea, are extreme generalists that use many host plant species from multiple plant families.2. Parameters of behavioural efficiency were monitored. Generalists spent more t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our ability to integrate all relevant dimensions enables a better assessment of the consequences of any changes in the environment (both biotic and abiotic) to which organisms are exposed, and determine the extent to which the behavioural repertoire displayed in response to changing conditions may be optimal. Where such methods are used in measures of foraging success they can be equated with energy expenditure to assess efficiency (Bernays et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our ability to integrate all relevant dimensions enables a better assessment of the consequences of any changes in the environment (both biotic and abiotic) to which organisms are exposed, and determine the extent to which the behavioural repertoire displayed in response to changing conditions may be optimal. Where such methods are used in measures of foraging success they can be equated with energy expenditure to assess efficiency (Bernays et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foraging and feeding can be hazardous, due to increased exposure to natural enemies (Bernays, 1997), and the risk of predation/parasitism accumulates with prolonged development and feeding (Moran and Hamilton, 1980;Loader and Damman, 1991;Benrey and Denno, 1997). It is widely thought that generalists are more susceptible to this kind of selective pressure than are specialists (Geitzenauer and Bernays, 1996;Oppenheim and Gould, 2002;Bernays et al, 2004). Rapid development and high protein consumption seen in HV are therefore explicable as evolved traits selected to reduce the higher predation risk experienced by this species under natural conditions.…”
Section: Compositions Of the Self-selected Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have treated interspecific comparisons between naturally generalist versus specialist species. These have shown specialists to be more efficient (Oppenhiem & Gould 2002), more accurate ( Janz & Nylin 1997), or both (Bernays et al 2004) in their selection and use of host plants. Two studies that compare conspecific populations exhibiting divergent degrees of specificity have similarly demonstrated the greater efficiency (Bernays & Funk 1999) and accuracy ( Janz & Nylin 1997) of more specialized forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%