2013
DOI: 10.3354/meps10116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foray foraging behavior: seasonally variable, food-driven migratory behavior in two calanoid copepod species

Abstract: We tested a hypothesis we termed 'foray foraging', which states that zooplankton make repeated short-term and short-distance migrations between food-rich surface layers and deeper layers throughout the night. Ultimately, the reason for the behavior is to balance the necessity of feeding with the predation risk in surface waters. We tested the hypothesis on 2 species of marine copepods, Calanus pacificus and Metridia pacifica, in Dabob Bay, Washington, USA. Zooplankton nets and traps were used to collect female… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the vertical, this assumption is well supported by observations of zooplankton aggregating in foodrich layers (Herman and Platt, 1983;Lampert, 2005;Giske et al, 1997). While it is difficult to observe individual lateral migration in the open ocean (Pearre, 2003), it is plausible that zooplankton, known to forage vertically between different depths based on the balance between predation risk and hunger (Pearre, 2003;Pierson et al, 2013), may drift with currents for longer at depth between unsuccessful forays to the surface, before vertically migrating less and staying closer to the surface once they find food (Bandara et al, 2021). This would lead to a similar consolidation of zooplankton around horizontally distributed T. Rohr et al high-density prey patches.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Sub-grid Scale Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In the vertical, this assumption is well supported by observations of zooplankton aggregating in foodrich layers (Herman and Platt, 1983;Lampert, 2005;Giske et al, 1997). While it is difficult to observe individual lateral migration in the open ocean (Pearre, 2003), it is plausible that zooplankton, known to forage vertically between different depths based on the balance between predation risk and hunger (Pearre, 2003;Pierson et al, 2013), may drift with currents for longer at depth between unsuccessful forays to the surface, before vertically migrating less and staying closer to the surface once they find food (Bandara et al, 2021). This would lead to a similar consolidation of zooplankton around horizontally distributed T. Rohr et al high-density prey patches.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Sub-grid Scale Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…4A , Table 2 ). Consequently, LP females emerge probably only for nocturnal feeding (a similar behaviour is discussed for marine copepods; [51] , [52] ). Additionally, the minimization of surface time would decrease fish predation pressure to which females are more vulnerable than males due to their larger sizes [53] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the vertical, this assumption is well supported by observations of zooplankton aggregating in food-rich layers (Giske et al, 1997;Herman & Platt, 1983;Lampert, 2005). While it is difficult to observe individual lateral migration in the open ocean (Pearre, 2003), it is plausible that zooplankton, known to forage vertically between different depths based on the balance between predation risk and hunger (Pearre, 2003;Pierson, Frost, & Leising, 2013), may drift with currents for longer at depth between unsuccessful forays to the surface, before vertically migrating less and staying closer to the surface once they find food (Bandara, Varpe, Wijewardene, Tverberg, & Eiane, 2021). This would lead to a similar consolidation of zooplankton around horizontally distributed high-density prey patches.…”
Section: G[z]) Reallocating the Initial Distribution Of Nutrients Bet...mentioning
confidence: 87%