Force decay of polyethylene terephthalate glycol aligner materials during simulation of typical clinical loading/unloading scenarios

Abstract

Background This in vitro study investigated the effect of three distinct daily loading/unloading cycles on force delivery during orthodontic aligner therapy. The cycles were applied for 7 days and were designed to reflect typical clinical aligner application scenarios. Materials and methods Flat polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PET-G) specimens (Duran®, Scheu Dental, Iserlohn, Germany) with thicknesses ranging between 0.4 and 0.75 mm were tested in a three-point-bending testing machine. Measurements comprised loading/unloading intervals of 12 h/12 h, 18 h/6 h, and 23 h/1 h, and specimens were exposed to bidistilled water during loading to simulate intraoral conditions. Results A very large decay in force for the PET‑G specimens could already be observed after the first loading period, with significantly different residual force values of 24, 20, and 21% recorded for the 12 h/12 h, 18 h/6 h, and 23 h/1 h loading/unloading modes, respectively (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.01). In addition, further decays in force from the first to the last loading period at day 7 of 13.5% (12 h/12 h), 9.7% (18 h/6 h), and 8.4% (23 h/1 h) differed significantly among the three distinct loading modes (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.01). Conclusion Although the initial material stiffness of PET‑G is relatively high, the transmission of excessive forces is attenuated by the high material-related force decay already within a few hours after intraoral insertion.

Antimicrobial and mechanical assessment of cellulose-based thermoformable material for invisible dental braces with natural essential oils protecting from biofilm formation

“…The mechanical stress stability (stress resistance) qualifies how forces are translated to the teeth over time during a clear aligner therapy 38 . The stress resistance of the loaded Naturaligner materials is comparable to relaxation behaviors of gold-standard materials like Duran, Zendura, and other similar materials 39 , and thus deliver sufficient forces over time to convert e.g. lateral and distalization movements during clear aligner therapies 40 .…”

Effect of oral environment on contemporary orthodontic materials and its clinical implications

“…Aligners are highly viscoelastic materials and react markedly to changes in temperature, humidity, elastic deformation, and manufacturing process. [ 64 ] The magnitude of changes in temperature and water-absorbing properties in a simulated intraoral environment differed in different aligners. [ 65 ] Hygroscopic expansion intraorally may affect the shape and orthodontic force applied to teeth.…”

Mechanical properties of orthodontic aligners: A review of the literature

“…The forces applied to individual teeth by aligners are affected by some material-dependent variables, such as the initial stiffness of the aligner and the behavior of the material during its intraoral application period [18,19] so the aim of this study is to identify the mechanical properties of aligners and to know if these are affected by variables such as thermoforming and the medium that simulates the oral cavity.…”