Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Purpose The aim was to investigate the effect of aging by thermocycling and mechanical loading on forces and moments generated by orthodontic clear aligners made from different thermoplastic materials. Methods A total of 25 thermoformed aligners made from 5 different materials, i.e., Essix ACE® and Essix® PLUS™ (Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany), Invisalign® (Align Technology, San Jose, CA, USA), Duran®+ (Iserlohn, Germany), Zendura™ (Fremont, CA, USA), underwent a 14-day aging protocol involving mechanical loading (a 0.2 mm vestibular malalignment of the upper left second premolar [tooth 25]) and thermocycling in deionized water (temperature range 5–55 °C). The 3D forces/moments exerted on tooth 25 of a resin model were measured at three time points: before aging (day 0), after 2 days and after 14 days of aging. Results Before aging, extrusion–intrusion forces were 0.6–3.0 N, orovestibular forces were 1.7–2.3 N, and moments as mesiodistal rotation were 0.3–42.1 Nmm. In all directions, multilayer Invisalign® exhibited the lowest force/moment magnitudes. After aging, all materials showed a significant force/moment decay within the first 2 days, except Invisalign® for orovestibular and vertical translation. However, following thermomechanical aging, Duran®+ and Zendura™ aligners had equivalent or even higher vestibular forces (direction of mechanical load). Conclusion Thermomechanical aging significantly reduced forces and moments during the first 48 h. Multilayer aligner materials exhibit lower initial forces and moments than single-layer ones, and were less influenced by aging. Material hardening was observed after subjecting some of the aligner materials to mechanical loading. Thus, orthodontists should be aware of possible deterioration of orthodontic aligners over time. This work also sheds light on how material selection impacts the mechanical behavior of aligners and may provide valuable guidance regarding optimal timing for the aligner changing protocol.
Purpose The aim was to investigate the effect of aging by thermocycling and mechanical loading on forces and moments generated by orthodontic clear aligners made from different thermoplastic materials. Methods A total of 25 thermoformed aligners made from 5 different materials, i.e., Essix ACE® and Essix® PLUS™ (Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany), Invisalign® (Align Technology, San Jose, CA, USA), Duran®+ (Iserlohn, Germany), Zendura™ (Fremont, CA, USA), underwent a 14-day aging protocol involving mechanical loading (a 0.2 mm vestibular malalignment of the upper left second premolar [tooth 25]) and thermocycling in deionized water (temperature range 5–55 °C). The 3D forces/moments exerted on tooth 25 of a resin model were measured at three time points: before aging (day 0), after 2 days and after 14 days of aging. Results Before aging, extrusion–intrusion forces were 0.6–3.0 N, orovestibular forces were 1.7–2.3 N, and moments as mesiodistal rotation were 0.3–42.1 Nmm. In all directions, multilayer Invisalign® exhibited the lowest force/moment magnitudes. After aging, all materials showed a significant force/moment decay within the first 2 days, except Invisalign® for orovestibular and vertical translation. However, following thermomechanical aging, Duran®+ and Zendura™ aligners had equivalent or even higher vestibular forces (direction of mechanical load). Conclusion Thermomechanical aging significantly reduced forces and moments during the first 48 h. Multilayer aligner materials exhibit lower initial forces and moments than single-layer ones, and were less influenced by aging. Material hardening was observed after subjecting some of the aligner materials to mechanical loading. Thus, orthodontists should be aware of possible deterioration of orthodontic aligners over time. This work also sheds light on how material selection impacts the mechanical behavior of aligners and may provide valuable guidance regarding optimal timing for the aligner changing protocol.
Purpose Dental crowding is a result of a mismatch between tooth size and arch dimensions, which leads to malocclusion; treatment often involves premolar extraction before orthodontic alignment. Clear aligners are limited in their ability to achieve canine distal bodily movement, a common orthodontic maneuver. This study investigated the impacts of attachment design and aligner material on the efficacy of canine distal bodily movement. Methods A finite element analysis was conducted to examine the impact of various attachment designs and two aligner materials, thermoplastic polyurethanes/polycarbonate (TPU/PC) and polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG), on mandibular canine distal bodily movement. The investigation focused on the biomechanical responses in the periodontal ligament (PDL) and surrounding alveolar bone. Results Attachment configuration exerted a strong influence on mandibular canine movement. Vertically oriented attachment pairs positioned mesially (mesial occlusal–mesial cervical) resulted in the most effective canine distal bodily movement, followed by a rectangular attachment. TPU/PC aligners induced slightly higher principal stresses in the PDL and von Mises stress and strain in the surrounding alveolar bone compared with PETG aligners; however, the difference was negligible, amounting to less than 6%. Conclusion Attachment design, specifically vertically oriented pairs positioned mesially (mesial occlusal–mesial cervical), was determined to be the crucial factor influencing the efficacy of canine distal bodily movement. The choice of aligner material (TPU/PC or PETG) has minimal impact on this orthodontic procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.