Surgical Robotics 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1126-1_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force Feedback and Sensory Substitution for Robot-Assisted Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final FBG locations (10, 11, 12) are used for force sensing. When the needle is modeled as a cantilever beam, the moment at the free end is zero.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final FBG locations (10, 11, 12) are used for force sensing. When the needle is modeled as a cantilever beam, the moment at the free end is zero.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following these investigations, it was Massimino who carried out more detailed and conclusive experiments which proved the viability of sensory substitution for force feedback in a wide range of circumstances [39], [26], [40]. Today, the most popular forms of sensory substitution for force feedback occur through visual, vibrotactile, and to a lesser extent auditory stimuli [31], [41], [42], [43].…”
Section: Coginfocom For Haptic Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach for providing surgical assistance (handling human error) is by providing haptic feedback, an ongoing topic of research [11]. Haptics is used to provide the surgeon with an indication when excessive forces are applied.…”
Section: Surgical Assistance Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%