2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.122.188101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force Generated by Two Kinesin Motors Depends on the Load Direction and Intermolecular Coupling

Abstract: Kinesins are molecular motors that carry cellular cargoes. While the mechanics of single kinesins are well characterized experimentally, the behavior of multiple kinesins varies considerably among experiments. The basis for this variability is unknown. Here, we resolve single-motor force measurements into a vertical component, which accelerates kinesin detachment, and a horizontal component, which decelerates the detachment when resisting the motor. This directionality, when the different experimental geometri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
79
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
14
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For different cellular processes in which the microtubule-kinesin complex can be subject to opposing forces such as during cargo transport and mitotic division the 3D orientation of the force vector can be significantly different between the two cases. A significant difference in the force vector due to the presence of a larger force component vertical to the microtubule in the single-bead assay 9 relative to three-bead assay is most likely the reason for the observed differences in <median-t > of the microtubule-kinesin complex between the two assays, supporting a recent theoretical study 7 . Moreover, when opposing forces are oriented mainly along the microtubule axis (dumbbell assay), kinesin's load-bearing capacity depends on the relative angular position of the pairs of opposing forces around the circumference of the microtubule.…”
Section: Main Textsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For different cellular processes in which the microtubule-kinesin complex can be subject to opposing forces such as during cargo transport and mitotic division the 3D orientation of the force vector can be significantly different between the two cases. A significant difference in the force vector due to the presence of a larger force component vertical to the microtubule in the single-bead assay 9 relative to three-bead assay is most likely the reason for the observed differences in <median-t > of the microtubule-kinesin complex between the two assays, supporting a recent theoretical study 7 . Moreover, when opposing forces are oriented mainly along the microtubule axis (dumbbell assay), kinesin's load-bearing capacity depends on the relative angular position of the pairs of opposing forces around the circumference of the microtubule.…”
Section: Main Textsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For vertical loads, velocity remains almost load-independent. To model the effect of the vectorial character of the load on the detachment process, we follow our recent model [22] that describes the detachment of a kinesin from a MT as a two-step process, which passes through three states: strongly bound state k1 − → weakly bound state k2 − → detached state k 1 and k 2 are the fast and slow detachment rates, respectively, that depend on the load F and displacement δ j = (δ xj , δ zj ) vectors according to k j = k 0 j e F ·δ j /k B T , where k 0 j (for j = 1, 2) are the unloaded rates. The effective detachment rate is then given by [22]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By fitting Equation (6) to the load-dependent detachment rate data [14], the two-step detachment model described the data by a continuous curve, where k 0 1 = 0.91 ± 0.38 s −1 , δ x1 = 2.90 ± 1.24 nm, δ z1 = 2.25 ± 0.75 nm, k 0 2 = 7.62 ± 0.74 s −1 , and δ z2 = 0.18 ± 0.01 nm (mean ± SE) [22]. This two-step model explained the effects of the load geometry on the detachment process [22]: i) detachment rate decreases with horizontal forces (i.e., catch-bond behaviour) when the force is resisting, and increases for assisting forces (see Fig. 3(A), dashed curve); and ii) detachment rate increases with vertical forces (i.e., slip-bond behaviour); see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7A; see Methods). The rates predicted from the trap data are slightly slower than experimentally observed in gliding assays, which may be due to geometric differences between the two types of study (42). Notably, based on the force-dependent fits from the optical trapping experiments, an assisting load of -2.8 pN on KIF3CC is predicted to have the same speed as unloaded KIFAC (103 nm/s), which is the same speed as KIF3AA under 2.8 pN hindering load ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%