2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force–interval relationship predicts mortality in survivors of myocardial infarction with atrial fibrillation

Abstract: PESPAfib, a measure for the FIR in patients with AF, can be derived from simultaneous ECG and blood pressure recordings. The results of this pilot study indicate that PESPAfib may be useful to predict adverse outcome in survivors of myocardial infarction suffering from AF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by relating the systolic pressure change to the RR interval change. 18 PESP Afib values were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors. When dichotomised at its median, PESP Afib distinguished between patient groups with 5-year mortality rates of 63 % and 19 %, respectively.…”
Section: Post-extrasystolic Potentiation As a Risk Predictor In Cardimentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…by relating the systolic pressure change to the RR interval change. 18 PESP Afib values were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors. When dichotomised at its median, PESP Afib distinguished between patient groups with 5-year mortality rates of 63 % and 19 %, respectively.…”
Section: Post-extrasystolic Potentiation As a Risk Predictor In Cardimentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Therefore, we developed a PESP-analogous parameter (PESP Afib ) and evaluated its association with mortality in a small cohort of 32 MI survivors with atrial fibrillation. 18 The ECGs were screened for short-long sequences, in which a heartbeat interval shorter than 80 % of the local average (P i ) was followed by an interval longer than 140 % of the local average (P i+1 ). Based on the systolic blood pressure values elicited by P i and P i+1 and the corresponding RR intervals (RR i and RR i+1 ), we calculated PESP Afib as (P i+1 -P i ) / (RR i+1 -RR i ),…”
Section: Post-extrasystolic Potentiation As a Risk Predictor In Cardimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eligible patients had survived acute MI less than four weeks before recruitment, they were aged 80 years or less, had sinus rhythm, and did not meet the criteria for secondary prophylactic implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator before hospital discharge. A total of 32 patients did not pass the initial screening due to atrial fibrillation (Sinnecker et al, 2015).…”
Section: Study Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause of the difference is not entirely understood, but is presumably due to altered Ca 2+ handling of the myocardial cells [6]. Studies of FIRs have been commonly conducted with invasive measures in laboratory settings, although recently Sinnecker et al [7] stated that FIR assessed by an unobtrusive blood pressure measurement predicts mortality in survivors of myocardial infarction with atrial fibrillation (AF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%