2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.473.833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force Modeling in Single Point Incremental Forming of Variable Wall Angle Components

Abstract: Prediction of forming forces in Incremental Sheet Forming (ISF) is specially important in the case of using adapted machinery not designed for the process. Moreover, forming force is an important indicator that can be monitored on-line and utilized for real time process control. Besides experimentation, simulations based on the Finite Element Method (FEM) have been utilized as a reliable source of process force data. Nevertheless, the long solution times required to simulate ISF renders difficult its inclusion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applicability of Eq. (4) for Variable Wall Angle (VWA) geometries has been validated in previous works of the authors [30,31] for different geometries.…”
Section: Forming Forcementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The applicability of Eq. (4) for Variable Wall Angle (VWA) geometries has been validated in previous works of the authors [30,31] for different geometries.…”
Section: Forming Forcementioning
confidence: 91%
“…4 shows the typical force variation that is expected during a SPIF operation. This model has been validated by benchmarking experiments done by several researchers [74,75], and also by comparison with finite element simulations as in Eyckens et al [69].…”
Section: Forces In Spifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testing blanks had dimensions of 150 x 150 mm, being the effective working area 120 x 120 mm. The geometry used in this work was a conical frustum with circular generatrix (see [8] for more details). The initial diameter of the truncated cone was set to 70 mm, being the initial drawing angle 20º and the generatrix radius 40 mm.…”
Section: Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%