2018
DOI: 10.1519/ssc.0000000000000353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force-Time Characteristics of the Countermovement Jump: Analyzing the Curve in Excel

Abstract: Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author's name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pagination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
166
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
166
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Between-session reliability was good (ICC = 0.83-0.85) with acceptable pooled CV values also. These data suggest that PF is a useful metric to monitor during jump assessments from force plates, this also in line with previous suggestions (5,8,12). In addition, a significant difference (p = 0.04) was present between limbs for PF during the second test session, when limbs were quantified as left and right.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Between-session reliability was good (ICC = 0.83-0.85) with acceptable pooled CV values also. These data suggest that PF is a useful metric to monitor during jump assessments from force plates, this also in line with previous suggestions (5,8,12). In addition, a significant difference (p = 0.04) was present between limbs for PF during the second test session, when limbs were quantified as left and right.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The dependant variables for the propulsive phase were: eccentric impulse (the sum of impulse from the end of unweighting period up until the end of the braking phase), concentric impulse (the sum of impulse from the end of the braking phase up until take off), peak force (maximum force obtained during the propulsive phase of the jump), and jump height (jump height was calculated using the velocity at takeoff). For the landing phase: landing impulse (the sum of impulse upon landing up until peak landing force) and peak landing force (maximum force obtained during the landing phase of the jump) were all later calculated in Microsoft Excel with force thresholds calculated from body weight ± 5 standard deviations (SD) (11,17,36).…”
Section: Single Leg Countermovement Jumps (Slcmj)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jump height from the force platform was calculated using the impulse -momentum method. The propulsive phase of each CMJ trial was identified using methods described by Chavda et al, (Chavda et al, 2018) and McMahon et al, (McMahon, Suchomel, Lake, & Comfort, 2018). Similar processing was adapted to SJ trials with the exclusion of an unweighting and braking phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SJ analysis began by finding the mean of one second of weighting once at the self-selected depth and then identifying the first instance in which ground reaction forces exceeded 5 standard deviations above the mean of the one second weighting to signify the initiation of movement. From this point, methods were identical to those used in the analysis of the CMJ (Chavda et al, 2018). Only the propulsive phase of the CMJ and SJ were used to determine mean muscle activity and the percentage of MVC during the jumping task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation