1994
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1021103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force-Velocity Relations in Human Skeletal Muscle

Abstract: Based on the physiological principles of the muscular force-velocity concept, this paper deals with the special problems associated with determining and interpreting force-velocity relations of muscles in situ particularly in humans. In the strict sense, instead of force-velocity relations merely torque-angular velocity relations of a joint can be measured directly under in situ conditions. This calls for biomechanical model calculations to obtain force-velocity relations of single muscles involved in joint mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for these differences observed between the upper and lower extremities may be associated with the extremity-related differences in maximal strength, type of training, muscle cross-section area, fibre-type distribution (Lexell et al 1983), muscle mechanics (i.e. length and muscle pennation angle) as well as functional differences according to the joint position and geometry of the joints and levers (Gu¨lch 1994). This type of information on different muscle groups and various actions may also be useful to create optimal strength and/or power training programmes for sports with different levels of strength and power demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A possible explanation for these differences observed between the upper and lower extremities may be associated with the extremity-related differences in maximal strength, type of training, muscle cross-section area, fibre-type distribution (Lexell et al 1983), muscle mechanics (i.e. length and muscle pennation angle) as well as functional differences according to the joint position and geometry of the joints and levers (Gu¨lch 1994). This type of information on different muscle groups and various actions may also be useful to create optimal strength and/or power training programmes for sports with different levels of strength and power demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Muscle force-length (F-L) and joint torque-angle relations in humans have been widely studied in the past (see Kulig et al, 1984, for a review), as have force-velocity (F-V) and torque-angular velocity relations, both in vitro and using isokinetic dynamometers (Cabri, 1991;Gulch, 1994). A number of studies have addressed both length and velocity (or angle and angular velocity) contributions together when examining muscle force or joint torque (Caldwell et al, 1993;Chow et al, 1999;Connelly and Vandervoort, 2000;James et al, 1994;King and Yeadon, 2002;Krylow and Sandercock, 1997;Lanza et al, 2003;Sutarno and McGill, 1995;Thorstensson et al, 1976;Westing and Seger, 1989;Abbott and Wilkie, 1953;Fuglevand, 1987;Marshall et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum available joint torques (t max i and t min i ) in above relation were considered to depend on angular position (u) and angular velocity ð _ uÞ of joints, due to muscle force-length [35] and muscle force-velocity [36], respectively. The relationship between maximum available joint torques, and angular position and angular velocity of the joints can be demonstrated by mathematical equations [37].…”
Section: Footmentioning
confidence: 99%