“…Large and historical series of patients who received pneumatic dilatation or myotomy have been retrospectively compared, and in association with the only one prospective controlled trial performed to compare both procedures confirmed that results are better in terms of both controlling dysphagia and complications after surgery, with a very low risk of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux [8,11,17]. Nevertheless, some authors argue that postoperative pain due to the surgical incision, together with high costs of the surgical procedure and of the lengthy hospitalization, make pneumatic dilatation more suitable than definitive surgical treatment [4,21]. But minor patient discomfort and a shorter hospital stay and convalescence are now ensured by minimally invasive techniques which allow for myotomy to be completed using laparoscopy or thoracoscopy [3,14,15,18].…”