2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forces on fields

Abstract: In electromagnetism, as in Newton's mechanics, action is always equal to reaction. The force from the electromagnetic field on matter is balanced by an equal and opposite force from matter on the field. We generally speak only of forces exerted by the field, not forces exerted upon the field. But, we should not be hesitant to speak of forces acting on the field. The electromagnetic field closely resembles a relativistic fluid and responds to forces in the same way. Analyzing this analogy sheds light on the ine… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This classical field 5 Given that the electron will be modeled classically in the next section as a lump of energy and charge in the classical Dirac field, one might wonder whether it makes sense to think of the above density of force as acting on a field (the Dirac field). For defense of the idea that forces act on both the electromagnetic and Dirac fields, see [28,29]. 6 Although I will not do so here, there are reasons (coming from quantum field theory) to treat the components of the Dirac field ψ at a given location as anticommuting Grassmann numbers instead of complex numbers (see [15] and references therein).…”
Section: Classical Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This classical field 5 Given that the electron will be modeled classically in the next section as a lump of energy and charge in the classical Dirac field, one might wonder whether it makes sense to think of the above density of force as acting on a field (the Dirac field). For defense of the idea that forces act on both the electromagnetic and Dirac fields, see [28,29]. 6 Although I will not do so here, there are reasons (coming from quantum field theory) to treat the components of the Dirac field ψ at a given location as anticommuting Grassmann numbers instead of complex numbers (see [15] and references therein).…”
Section: Classical Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(If you do not agree that potential energy is extrinsic energy, you may read this paper as an exploration of intrinsic and extrinsic energy-asking whether there is a separate intrinsic energy density for the electromagnetic field and another for charged matter. 5 )…”
Section: Potential Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. The electromagnetic field has an energy density and, applying the above version of mass energy equivalence, it also has a relativistic mass density equal to its energy density divided by c 2 [2, box 8.3]; [5,25]. Similarly, the Dirac field has a relativistic mass density equal to its energy density divided by c 2 [67, p. 238]; [68, p. 35]; [63,64].…”
Section: Classical Maxwell-dirac Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation