2016
DOI: 10.7577/nibr/rapport/2016/12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forebygging av radikalisering og voldelig ekstremisme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They argue that social workers are caught in between safeguarding the rights of their non-criminal clients and acting as informants to security agencies because their clients might be further radicalized in the future and pose a threat. This conflict has been reported in several studies concerning social work and PVE (Dryden 2017;Herz 2016;Lid et al 2016). Finch and McKendrick (2017) argue that introducing PVE duty into social work generally contributes to the securitization of social work.…”
Section: Firstline Professionals and Prevention Of Violent Extremismmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…They argue that social workers are caught in between safeguarding the rights of their non-criminal clients and acting as informants to security agencies because their clients might be further radicalized in the future and pose a threat. This conflict has been reported in several studies concerning social work and PVE (Dryden 2017;Herz 2016;Lid et al 2016). Finch and McKendrick (2017) argue that introducing PVE duty into social work generally contributes to the securitization of social work.…”
Section: Firstline Professionals and Prevention Of Violent Extremismmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Before 2010, local communities had implemented measures to tackle violent extremism, such as that of the right-wing extremist milieus of the 1990s and 2000s (Carlsson & Haaland, 2004). Back then, however, the dominant view was still that violent extremism was a matter for the police and their security service (Lid et al, 2016). The first action plan marks the beginning of a policy that moves away from giving law enforcement the monopoly of PRVE -towards a national strategy involving much wider sectors of society.…”
Section: From Escalation To De-escalation: Five Phases Of Development In the Plural Policing Of Militant Islamismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several SLT/SaLTo interviewees spoke of similar experiences during this phase, putting particular emphasis on their lack of knowledge about the phenomena (radicalization and Islamist extremism) which they were tasked to manage by the 2014 action plan. Uncertainty was expressed about how they should assess the threat at hand, and how to identify and monitor residents that were involved in, or might be becoming involved in MI (see Lid et al, 2016). Seemingly, it was not until 2014 that central government, municipalities, schools, the social welfare and health services, parts of civil society and others embarked on intensive collective efforts to fulfil the central aim of the new action plan: enhanced multi-agency cooperation to enable a broad and more efficient apparatus for detecting and managing RVE.…”
Section: From Escalation To De-escalation: Five Phases Of Development In the Plural Policing Of Militant Islamismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations