2022
DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting brain activity based on models of spatiotemporal brain dynamics: A comparison of graph neural network architectures

Abstract: Comprehending the interplay between spatial and temporal characteristics of neural dynamics can contribute to our understanding of information processing in the human brain. Graph neural networks (GNNs) provide a new possibility to interpret graph structured signals like those observed in complex brain networks. In our study we compare different spatio-temporal GNN architectures and study their ability to model neural activity distributions obtained in functional MRI (fMRI) studies. We evaluate the performance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chebnet, a GCN, did appear to be better suited to model individual fMRI data. This result extends the similar conclusion of [11], [32] on BOLD auto-regression at the group level to the individual level. We hypothesize that the GCN's marginal improvement over linear models might be mainly attributable to better complexity efficiency and balance between spatial and temporal interactions on long time ranges, rather than the use of nonlinearities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Chebnet, a GCN, did appear to be better suited to model individual fMRI data. This result extends the similar conclusion of [11], [32] on BOLD auto-regression at the group level to the individual level. We hypothesize that the GCN's marginal improvement over linear models might be mainly attributable to better complexity efficiency and balance between spatial and temporal interactions on long time ranges, rather than the use of nonlinearities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The superior performance of graph convolutional networks over VAR to model BOLD time-series is consistent with Wein's group studies [11], [32]. Our results extend these findings to the individual level.…”
Section: Model Comparison Key Features Of High Performance Modelssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, a new field of geometric deep learning, graph neural networks (GNNs), has emerged, which has given the possibility to effectively process signals in the non-Euclidean geometry of graphs. Recently more and more GNNs have been proposed and applied in brain MRI analysis and disorder detection [21,22]. Parisot et al [23] introduced the spectral graph convolution network (GCN) with rfMRI and non-imaging data, representing populations as a sparse graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to our knowledge, no previous studies have used a graph neural network (GNN), in conjunction with HD-EMG signals, to identify the movement/grasping that the amputee intends to perform. GNNs are helpful in a context where a high number of temporally-correlated spatial information is available [12]. This kind of neural network is composed of several propagation modules, which propagate information between nodes so that the aggregated information can capture both feature-based and topological information [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%