2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12546-018-9205-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting mortality rates: multivariate or univariate models?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the RMSFE all,16 of the CSVAR 1 model increase from 0.1106 and 0.1358 to 0.1159 and 0.1396 for UK and French data, respectively. One possible reason of the reduced accuracy in the two-population case is that the VAR model may produce less accurate forecasts when more irrelevant information is included (Feng and Shi 2018). Therefore, the application of a uniform penalty term may lead to the estimatedM andB that poorly reflect the historical mortality pattern of both populations.…”
Section: The Two-population Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the RMSFE all,16 of the CSVAR 1 model increase from 0.1106 and 0.1358 to 0.1159 and 0.1396 for UK and French data, respectively. One possible reason of the reduced accuracy in the two-population case is that the VAR model may produce less accurate forecasts when more irrelevant information is included (Feng and Shi 2018). Therefore, the application of a uniform penalty term may lead to the estimatedM andB that poorly reflect the historical mortality pattern of both populations.…”
Section: The Two-population Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, ETS models with seasonal components are not applicable to our study because seasonality is not present in mortality forecasting. In addition, Feng and Shi (2018) suggest that only 2 A maximum likelihood method may also be employed to calibrate the parameters (Renshaw and Haberman 2003).…”
Section: Exponential Smoothing State Space (Ets) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the LC model receives criticisms for its insufficient allowance for potential volatility in mortality forecasts (see, for example, Wong et al 2020), it has been regarded as a benchmark in various studies. For instance, Feng and Shi (2018) adopt the exponential smoothing state space (ETS) model 1 to predict mortality rates and compare its performance with those under the LC, functional data model (FDM) as well as some univariate time series processes. Thereinto, the ETS model turns out to be the best-performing choice based on Australian population data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further examine the forecasting effectiveness of the ASTAR model shown above, we follow Feng and Shi (2018) and perform simulation studies in this section. For all five countries, we generate 1,000 replicates.…”
Section: Empirical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has spurred serious concerns regarding the corresponding mortality and longevity risks. Mortality (longevity) risk describes the fact that people are surviving shorter (longer) than expected (Feng & Shi, 2018); For instance, advances in medical science, technological improvements, and lifestyle changes may very likely result in greater mortality improvements, thus increasing the exposure to longevity risk. For demographic research, accurate mortality forecasting is critical to practices such as population projection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%