2012
DOI: 10.9753/icce.v33.waves.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting the Wave-Current Interactions at the Mouth of the Columbia River, Or, Usa

Abstract: An operational wave forecast of the area near the mouth of the Columbia River is presented. This region is known for its large waves and strong tidal currents. The forecast is forced with full directional spectra obtained from a refined WaveWatchIII forecast of the Pacific Northwest, and tidal current inputs are obtained from an estuarine circulation forecast of the Columbia River. The forecast has been operational since August 2011 providing short-term predictive wave information at the mouth of the Columbia … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inlet entrance is roughly 3.5 km wide, and has been engineered with two jetties at the mouth (a third jetty was also constructed inside the river mouth), and a dredged shipping channel is maintained out the west facing inlet, turning southward. Previous studies have shown strong wave‐current interactions at this site, using both remote sensing data [ Gonzalez and Rosenfeld , ] and model simulations [ Kassem and Ozkan‐Haller , ]. Field measurements of waves and wave breaking have historically been sparse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The inlet entrance is roughly 3.5 km wide, and has been engineered with two jetties at the mouth (a third jetty was also constructed inside the river mouth), and a dredged shipping channel is maintained out the west facing inlet, turning southward. Previous studies have shown strong wave‐current interactions at this site, using both remote sensing data [ Gonzalez and Rosenfeld , ] and model simulations [ Kassem and Ozkan‐Haller , ]. Field measurements of waves and wave breaking have historically been sparse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Columbia River plume has been studied by many previous authors, in particular Kilcher and Nash [] who describe the shear‐driven interfacial mixing as the plume spreads offshore and McCabe et al [] who describe the salt fluxes of the spreading plume in a Lagrangian frame. The transformation of waves at the Columbia River mouth has also been studied by previous authors, in particular Gonzalez and Rosenfeld [] who describe the refraction and focusing of waves in the presence of the opposing currents and Kassem and Ozkan‐Haller [] who show increased wave heights and steepness in the presence of the opposing currents. In contrast to the previous works, our study is limited to an assessment of the wave‐driven processes at the edge of the river plume as it spreads offshore during ebb tides, in particular where the vertical and lateral processes collide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, the case γ = 0 gives rise to a large number of rotational waves, which display a variety of different characteristics. This mechanism describes waves where wavecurrent interactions cause significant increase of the wave amplitude in little time; such a case appears at the Columbia River entrance, where tidal currents cause a doubling in the wave height; see [36,37].…”
Section: (B) Bifurcation and Linearized Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%