2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00703-019-00669-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting tropical cyclones in the Bay of Bengal using quasi-operational WRF and HWRF modeling systems: an assessment study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For TC Roanu the errors are 83 hours (ATM) or 78 hours (CPL). For similar lead times, landfall position errors are comparable to reported errors for Vardah and Roanu forecasted using atmosphere-only configurations of WRF and the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) model (Nadimpalli et al, 2020). Position errors also 555 compare favourably to global model simulations of TC Fani (Singh et al, 2021).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For TC Roanu the errors are 83 hours (ATM) or 78 hours (CPL). For similar lead times, landfall position errors are comparable to reported errors for Vardah and Roanu forecasted using atmosphere-only configurations of WRF and the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) model (Nadimpalli et al, 2020). Position errors also 555 compare favourably to global model simulations of TC Fani (Singh et al, 2021).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Both ATM and CPL underestimate the intensity of stronger TCs and overestimate the intensity of weaker TCs. Nadimpalli et al (2020) have highlighted a similar bias in the WRF model for Bay of Bengal cyclones. In general, CPL predicts less intense storms than ATM, consistent with the lower SSTs and overestimation of SST 560 cooling in cyclone wakes in CPL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analyses of axisymmetric and asymmetric TC rainfall structures have recently been receiving more attention because of its destructive flooding potential in especially the coastal regions (Jiang and Zipser, ; Villarini et al ., ). Present‐day numerical models are capable of producing realistic TC information regarding track, intensity, structure, and rainfall over the North Indian Ocean (NIO) basin (Osuri et al ., ; ; Nadimpalli et al ., ; ; Busireddy et al ., ) and other global TC basins (Yeh et al ., ; Chen et al ., ; Bassill, ; Matyas et al ., ). The NIO (comprises Bay of Bengal—BoB; and the Arabian Sea–AS) is one of the basins that are prone to TCs but lacks behind without good observational setup to comprehend the realistic TC rainfall characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancements in the dense observational network such as in-situ, satellite, radar, and other remote sensed platforms, the TC movement's prediction accuracy has been improved from the last few decades [12]. Significant improvements have been achieved in the prediction of the track of TC since the previous few years due to the advancements in numerical weather prediction models and data assimilation techniques over the NIO basin [6,7,18,20,21,23], 2015, 2017, [14][15][16], Mohanty et al, 2015Mohanty et al, ,2019, [2]. However, the intensity prediction is still a challenging task for the operational and research community due to their intensity changes such as rapid intensification (RI) 1 and rapid decay (RD) 2 over the basin [11,26], [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%