2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting VaR and ES using a joint quantile regression and its implications in portfolio allocation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where refers to the indicator function, which is 1 if r v ≤ , that is, a VaR exceedance occurs, and 0 otherwise. Of the broad FZ family, the aforementioned loss function FZ0 is the primary option in terms of risk estimation and backtesting; see related papers, Nolde and Ziegel (2017), Patton et al (2019), andMerlo et al (2021).…”
Section: Adjustment Methodology For Risk Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where refers to the indicator function, which is 1 if r v ≤ , that is, a VaR exceedance occurs, and 0 otherwise. Of the broad FZ family, the aforementioned loss function FZ0 is the primary option in terms of risk estimation and backtesting; see related papers, Nolde and Ziegel (2017), Patton et al (2019), andMerlo et al (2021).…”
Section: Adjustment Methodology For Risk Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LFZ0 ${L}_{FZ0}$ is the FZ0 $FZ0$ loss function considered in this paper, formulated as follows: LFZ0(r,v,e;α)=1αedouble-struck1{rv}(vr)+ve+log(e)1, ${L}_{FZ0}(r,v,e;\alpha )=-\frac{1}{\alpha e}{\mathbb{1}}\{r\le v\}(v-r)+\frac{v}{e}+\mathrm{log}(-e)-1,$ where double-struck1 ${\mathbb{1}}$ refers to the indicator function, which is 1 if rv $r\le v$, that is, a VaR exceedance occurs, and 0 otherwise. Of the broad FZ $FZ$ family, the aforementioned loss function FZ0 $FZ0$ is the primary option in terms of risk estimation and backtesting; see related papers, Nolde and Ziegel (2017), Patton et al (2019), and Merlo et al (2021).…”
Section: Adjustment Methodology For Risk Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different methods considered throughout the literature, quantile regression, introduced by Koenker & Bassett (1978), has represented a valid approach for modeling the entire distribution of returns while accounting for the well-known stylized facts, i.e., high kurtosis, skewness and serial correlation, that typically characterize financial assets. In the financial literature, the quantile regression framework has been positively applied to estimate and forecast Value at Risk (VaR) and quantile-based risk measures (Engle & Manganelli 2004, White et al 2015, Taylor 2019, Merlo et al 2021. Several generalizations of the concept of quantiles have also been introduced over the years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, dependency of observations may be seen as a clustering effect (Bergsma et al 2009) which arises in a number of sampling designs, including clustered, multilevel, spatial, and repeated measures (Heagerty et al 2000, Bergsma et al 2009, Geraci & Bottai 2014. In this context, quantile methods for modeling dependent-type data have been considered in a wide range of different applications spanning from medicine (Smith et al 2015, Farcomeni 2012, Alfò et al 2017, Marino et al 2018, Merlo, Maruotti & Petrella 2021, social inequality (Heise & Kotsadam 2015), economics (Bassett & Chen 2002, Kozumi & Kobayashi 2011, Bernardi et al 2015, Giovannetti et al 2018, Merlo, Petrella & Raponi 2021, environmental modeling (Hendricks & Koenker 1992, Pandey & Nguyen 1999, Reich et al 2011) and education (Kelcey et al 2019). When the interest of the research is on the entire conditional distribution, in addition to the classical quantile regression, a possible alternative approach is to consider the M-quantile regression proposed by Breckling & Chambers (1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%