2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-131x(200011)19:6<499::aid-for745>3.0.co;2-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting volatility of emerging stock markets: linear versus non-linear GARCH models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with many previous studies (see for example, Franses & Van Dijk [43], Gokcan [44] and AL-Najjar [45], the study applies the GARCH (1,1). This …”
Section: The Garch (11) Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with many previous studies (see for example, Franses & Van Dijk [43], Gokcan [44] and AL-Najjar [45], the study applies the GARCH (1,1). This …”
Section: The Garch (11) Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard way is to use the square of returns (or returns minus the sample mean if it is not zero) as an approximation (see, inter alia, Poon andGranger, 2003, andGokcan, 2000). Andersen and Bollerslev (1998), however, argued that using this definition generally leads to a model with poor goodness-of-fit, because this measurement typically displayed a large degree of idiosyncratic, observation-by-observation variation (see particularly their Figure 1).…”
Section: Application To Volatility Forecastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to this issue, Hill et al (1988) show that unexpected changes in volatility are the most important risk factor in determining the cost of portfolio insurance. Similarly, Chu and Bubnys (1990) use a likelihood ratio test to compare the variance measure of price volatilities of stock market indices and their corresponding futures contracts during the bull market of the 1980s, and find that spot market volatilities are significantly lower than their respective futures price volatilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Braiisford and Faff (1996), on the other hand, find that GARCH models are slightly superior to most simple models for forecasting Australian monthly stock index volatility, and Frances and van Dijk (1996) find that the asymmetric GARCH models perform no better than the standard GARCH model in forecasting the weekly volatility of various European stock markets. Gokcan (2000) finds that, for emerging stock markets, the basic GARCH(1,1) model performs better than EGARCH models, while Wei (2002) presents QGARCH as a better model than either the basic GARCH or the GJR-GARCH model for forecasting the weekly volatility on the China stock market.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%