2018
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.711.246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting Yield of Major Crops in Different District of Middle Gujarat and North Gujarat Using Statistical Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between the actual and predicted value of wheat, mustard and potato crop yield for Aligarh, Baghpat, Barielly, Bijnor, Bulandshahar, Gaziabad, Meerut, Muzaffarnagar, Rampur, Saharnpur and Sahjahnpur Western Uttar Pradesh in used developing the Statistical Model is present in the (Table -5). Results show that in the different 11 districts for the year 2015 and 2016 present of 2015-2016 the percentage error where also calculated that the actual yield and forecasted yield is acceptable ranged between the ±0.1 to 8.9 percent [14].…”
Section: Validation Of Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Between the actual and predicted value of wheat, mustard and potato crop yield for Aligarh, Baghpat, Barielly, Bijnor, Bulandshahar, Gaziabad, Meerut, Muzaffarnagar, Rampur, Saharnpur and Sahjahnpur Western Uttar Pradesh in used developing the Statistical Model is present in the (Table -5). Results show that in the different 11 districts for the year 2015 and 2016 present of 2015-2016 the percentage error where also calculated that the actual yield and forecasted yield is acceptable ranged between the ±0.1 to 8.9 percent [14].…”
Section: Validation Of Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The model results showed up to 90% variation in the yield of groundnuts, 93% variation in the product of paddy, up to 87% variation in maize yield, up to 90% variation in the development of wheat and mustard. The model predicted the product with less than 10% deviation; conclude that this model can be used for yield forecasting (Yadav et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%