2012
DOI: 10.1177/0363546512439182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forefoot Running Improves Pain and Disability Associated With Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome

Abstract: In 10 consecutive patients with CECS, a 6-week forefoot strike running intervention led to decreased postrunning lower leg intracompartmental pressures. Pain and disability typically associated with CECS were greatly reduced for up to 1 year after intervention. Surgical intervention was avoided for all patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
162
5
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
162
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in accordance with suggestions by the distributor and similar to those used in the study by Diebal et al 27 to encourage a FFS. Subjects ran for another 2 min attempting to follow the instructions, which were repeated after one and 2 min.…”
Section: Motion Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This was in accordance with suggestions by the distributor and similar to those used in the study by Diebal et al 27 to encourage a FFS. Subjects ran for another 2 min attempting to follow the instructions, which were repeated after one and 2 min.…”
Section: Motion Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There has been growing interest in footstrike patterns (FSP) during running, particularly given recent suggestions of a link to injury [1][2][3][4]. Footstrike patterns have been most commonly considered for middle-and long-distance runners and qualified by discrete classification, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RFS, MFS or FFS, is the poor resolution meaning that subtle changes in FSP with running velocity are missed. Indeed, considering the injury statistics for long-distance runners (between 19% and 79% attain at least one injury per year [1,12]) and the suggested link to FSP [1][2][3][4], is it really beneficial to group >75% of runners into a single category (RFS) in our search for greater understanding?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…É plausível que os corredores com apoio atrasado, com o aumento das cargas de impacto, possam ter um maior risco de desenvolver lesões. A modificação de apoio atrasado para adiantado pode reduzir a dor patelo-femural 11 , e a dor associada à síndrome compartimental crônica do esforço 12 com a redução de impactos é provável que provoque uma diminuição global do risco de lesões e neste sentido, seria interessante a adoção de uma SC plana o adiantada 13 . Aliás, correr descalço com apoio adiantado reduz o tempo de apoio e o tempo de voo, há um menor pico de força, maior impulso de freado e de impulso, além de uma maior pré-ativação dos músculos do tríceps sural do que quando se está calçado 14 .…”
Section: Palavrasunclassified