2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foregone harvests and neoliberal policies: Creating opportunities for rural, small-scale, community-based fisheries in southern Alaskan coastal villages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, smallscale fishing operations and rural coastal communities can be irreversibly and disproportionately impacted by the transformations generated by fisheries privatization schemes. For example, crew and boat owners lose jobs as increasing costs force small-boat owners to sell fishing rights [9], remaining crew receive less shares [10] or become wage laborers [11], women and migrant workers lose jobs when small-scale on-shore processing facilities close due to decreases in fish deliveries [12], local fishing practices and values become marginalized [13,14] and existing social inequalities in rural communities can deepen, causing tension between those who hold fishing rights and those who do not [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, smallscale fishing operations and rural coastal communities can be irreversibly and disproportionately impacted by the transformations generated by fisheries privatization schemes. For example, crew and boat owners lose jobs as increasing costs force small-boat owners to sell fishing rights [9], remaining crew receive less shares [10] or become wage laborers [11], women and migrant workers lose jobs when small-scale on-shore processing facilities close due to decreases in fish deliveries [12], local fishing practices and values become marginalized [13,14] and existing social inequalities in rural communities can deepen, causing tension between those who hold fishing rights and those who do not [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these instances, overharvest can threaten the long-term viability of wild salmon populations and fisheries (e.g., Connors et al 2019 ). Management measures to limit the impacts of these mixed-stock fisheries may also be harmful to fishing communities if they reduce fishing opportunity for locally abundant populations (Martin 2008 , Langdon 2015 , Walters et al 2019 ). By the 1960s, concerns over declining salmon runs drove efforts to curb overcapitalization through license privatization, consolidation, and buybacks efforts in both Canada and the United States (Newell 1993 , Brown 2005 , Carothers 2010 ).…”
Section: Contemporary Salmon Management: History and Challenges To Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the 1960s, concerns over declining salmon runs drove efforts to curb overcapitalization through license privatization, consolidation, and buybacks efforts in both Canada and the United States (Newell 1993 , Brown 2005 , Carothers 2010 ). Efforts to shrink the commercial fishing fleet ultimately reduced the number of commercial licenses and fishing boats in remote and Indigenous communities, undermining access to salmon-fishing livelihoods and food security (Carothers 2010 , Langdon 2015 , Angel 2017 , Steel 2020 ). The social–ecological and economic viability of commercial salmon fisheries has been further undermined by infrequent or unpredictable openings (e.g., Martin 2008 , Walters et al 2019 ), fluctuations in prices driven by global markets, and management objectives that are often narrowly focused on maintaining maximum sustainable yields (Adkinson and Finney 2003 , Bjorndal et al 2003 , Hilborn 2006 , Healey 2009 ).…”
Section: Contemporary Salmon Management: History and Challenges To Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involves exploring two related issues: the first concerns the capability for potential merging of multiple transformation pathways to facilitate innovative spillover and cross-fertilization-where one pathway may yield learnings for the growth of others. The second concerns the potential for transformation pathways to facilitate more interstitial space in which new pathways can grow, ultimately creating 'safe havens' of empowerment within existing institutional structures [125].…”
Section: Scaling Local Fisher Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformation pathways begin with the risk of remaining just reactive alternatives to the mainstream, owing their dynamism to the 'oppositional status' created by the hegemonic neoliberal regime [126]. Fishers thus need to be careful to establish their transformation pathways beyond oppositional entities towards developing new governance modes based upon public priorities and fisher sovereignty [125].…”
Section: Scaling Local Fisher Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%