2021
DOI: 10.1017/aap.2021.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foregrounding Daily Data Collection on Archaeological Fieldwork

Abstract: OverviewDaily data collection during archaeological fieldwork forms the basis for later interpretation and analysis. Across the world, we observe a wide variety of digital data collection methods and tools employed during fieldwork. Here, we detail the daily practices at four recent survey and excavation projects in the South Caucasian country of Armenia. As archaeology continues to become ever more digital, it is useful to consider these day-to-day recording processes at a typical field project. We provide de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objects found were then left at the town and placed in the Cerro Gordo Museum (previously the General Store), as are any other objects found by Underwood. Another video features Underwood excavating the dump under the icehouse of the American Hotel site (after its destruction) looking for artifacts and bottles, with little consideration for contextual preservation (Underwood 2020g; compare, of course, the efforts of professional archaeologists, such as Petrosyan et al 2021). This also holds true for objects found in the mines, which are picked up and moved without proper assessment or documentation (except for the videos themselves).…”
Section: Recording and Reconstructing Cerro Gordomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objects found were then left at the town and placed in the Cerro Gordo Museum (previously the General Store), as are any other objects found by Underwood. Another video features Underwood excavating the dump under the icehouse of the American Hotel site (after its destruction) looking for artifacts and bottles, with little consideration for contextual preservation (Underwood 2020g; compare, of course, the efforts of professional archaeologists, such as Petrosyan et al 2021). This also holds true for objects found in the mines, which are picked up and moved without proper assessment or documentation (except for the videos themselves).…”
Section: Recording and Reconstructing Cerro Gordomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emmitt (2022) discusses how YouTube videos add to the spread of misinformation, “with pseudoarcheology given a platform that is mixed with factual content” (Emmitt 2022:5). Out of the 30 TikToks I watched, I flagged 10 of them as questionable because either they violated certain ethics (e.g., improper excavations as compared to the care with which professionals work [Petrosyan et al 2021]) or creators appeared to be spreading misinformation. Although generating excitement and drawing attention to the significance of archaeology is important, it should be done in a way that removes false perceptions about the ancient world.…”
Section: Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avid metal-detecting amateurs often possess superior operational skill in locating metal finds in comparison to those of a qualified archaeologist. On the other hand, the methodical approach and expert knowledge of archaeology graduates often yield a better scientific return (Petrosyan et al 2021). Initiatives such as PAN and similar projects in other countries aim to synergize the knowledge production potential of both actors.…”
Section: Pan and Common Public Reporting Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%