2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2571786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign Aid and Governance in Africa

Abstract: Purpose -This paper investigates the effect of foreign aid on governance in order to extend the debates on foreign aid and to verify common positions from Moyo's 'Dead Aid', Collier's 'Bottom Billion' and Eubank's 'Somaliland'. The empirical evidence is based on updated data from 52 African countries for the period 1996-2010.Design/methodology/approach -An endogeneity robust instrumental variable Two-Stage-Least Squares empirical strategy is employed.Findings -The findings reveal that development assistance de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
58
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
7
58
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This expectation is consistent with the standard instrumental variable approach in which the rejection of the null hypothesis of the Sargan Overidentifying Restrictions (OIR) test indicates that the proposed instruments explain the outcome variable beyond the proposed channels or endogenous explaining mechanisms (Beck et al, 2003;Asongu & Nwachukwu, 2016d).…”
Section: 22identification and Exclusion Restrictionssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This expectation is consistent with the standard instrumental variable approach in which the rejection of the null hypothesis of the Sargan Overidentifying Restrictions (OIR) test indicates that the proposed instruments explain the outcome variable beyond the proposed channels or endogenous explaining mechanisms (Beck et al, 2003;Asongu & Nwachukwu, 2016d).…”
Section: 22identification and Exclusion Restrictionssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…categorisation of endogenous explaining and strictly exogenous variables) is assessed with the Difference in Hansen Test (DHT) for instrument exogeneity. This criterion for assessing the validity of the exclusion restriction is consistent with the standard instrumental variable (IV)approach in which, failure to reject the null hypothesis of the over-identifying restrictions test is an indication that the strictly exogenous variables do not explain the outcome variable beyond the proposed mechanisms (Beck et al, 2003;Asongu & Nwachukwu, 2016d). Hence, in order for the exclusion restriction assumption to hold, the null hypothesis of the DHT should not be rejected in the results that are disclosed in the next section.…”
Section: Generalised Methods Of Moments: Specification Identificationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Hence, in the findings that are reported in the empirical results section, the exclusion restriction assumption is confirmed if the null hypothesis of the DHT connected to instrumental variables (IV) (year, eq (diff)) is not rejected. This process of assessing the validity of exclusion restriction is similar to the standard IV procedure, whereby the failure to reject the null hypothesis of the Sargan Overidentifying Restrictions (OIR) test is an indication that strictly exogenous variables affect inclusive development exclusively via the suspected endogenous variable channels (Asongu & Nwachukwu, ; Beck, Demirgüç‐Kunt, & Levine, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%