Foreign Assistance, International Norms, and NGO Development: Lessons from the Russian Campaign

Abstract

Why have Western donors' efforts to encourage development of Russian nongovernmental organizations~NGOs! varied dramatically in two different NGO sectors, despite similar levels of assistance? I forward a norms-based explanation for varying success in bolstering the Russian women's and soldiers' rights movements+ Where foreign assistance is employed to promote norms that are universally embraced, it is highly likely to lead to a successful NGO movement+ In contrast, when foreign assistance pursues norms that are specific to other societal contexts, it will fail to develop an NGO movement, regardless of the amount of funding foreign donors devote+ NGOs and foreign donors have succeeded by articulating a universal norm against physical harm in the cases of soldiers' rights and domestic violence, but have failed by voicing specifically Western norms of gender equality and feminism in the case of women's rights+ I wish to thank

Between a Rock and a Hard Place: International NGOs and the Dual Pressures of Donors and Host Governments

“…when the citizens of the countries they target have better access to information and contact with the global community). Additionally, these INGOs are most effective when addressing issues that have broad, unified domestic support, a finding in line with past research (Sundstrom 2005) and with the turn to a focus on domestic "ownership" of development aid more generally (Woods 2008). Advocacy INGOs are also more effective when they have the support of other states, IGOs, and INGOs-notably, INGOs that work in countries that play host to other internationally focused INGOs have better success.…”

Outside Funding and the Dynamics of Participation in Community Associations

“…Tripp (2000), Mansuri and Rao (2004), and Platteau and Gaspart (2002) have voiced concerns that outside funding can lead to elite capture of organizations of the poor in developing countries. Other authors suggest that outside funding benefits more advantaged groups (Henderson, 2002;Sundstrom, 2005), reduces the role of the disadvantaged within these groups (Garforth, 1994;Howes, 1997), or shifts the membership and leadership of such groups away from the grassroots and towards more professional elites (Igoe, 2003). Payne (1995) shows how the success of the southern civil rights movement changed the rewards available to participants, attracting higher status individuals who saw opportunities for prestige and political influence.…”

Entrepreneurial NPOs in Russia: Rationalizing the Mission

“…Those organizations were membership-based associations as well as nonmembership-based professional NPOs that engaged in both advocacy and service provision, often relying purely on external grants and sponsorships (Kulmala 2011). Transnational donor organizations that were highly influential in setting the nonprofit agenda during the 1990s prioritized human rights organizations and organizations created around specific issues, such as the environment, the AIDS epidemic, gender equality, etc., and largely failed to engage SONPOs that traditionally addressed local social problems (Sundstrom 2005). Private and corporate charity foundations started to gradually emerge during the same period.…”