2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-248x.2010.01078.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign body granuloma in the submental region due to fish bone: a case report

Abstract: The purpose of this article was to describe the clinical and microscopic features of a foreign‐body granuloma in submental region that resulted from a fish bone embedded in the floor of mouth. A 45‐year‐old female patient complained of a hard mass in submental region. Clinical examination showed a non‐compressible, firm, fixed lump, painless on palpation. Ultrasound examination showed an internally uneven, uncircumscribed, hypoechoic mass with a steaky hyperechoic spot of 1.1 cm length in the center. A microsc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A careful evaluation of the radio density and the deviation of the normal anatomic structure of the hard palate on the right side were evaluated to locate the foreign body however an IOPA of the lip would have been more informative and evaluative, hannon et al reported a silica granuloma of the lip (5) odell et al reported a foreign body giant cell reaction elicited by a haemostatic alginate, (6) owens et al published a study showing oral amalgam tattoos accounted for almost 1% of approximately 19000 pathology reports on file, (7) Ding et al reported foreign body granuloma in the sub mental region due to fish bone. (8) Although foreign body reactions are commonly associated with trauma related events, it is important to investigate and evaluate them with utmost care. A proper history, clinical evaluation and the appropriate investigation will help us in diagnosis and treatment of these conditions with accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A careful evaluation of the radio density and the deviation of the normal anatomic structure of the hard palate on the right side were evaluated to locate the foreign body however an IOPA of the lip would have been more informative and evaluative, hannon et al reported a silica granuloma of the lip (5) odell et al reported a foreign body giant cell reaction elicited by a haemostatic alginate, (6) owens et al published a study showing oral amalgam tattoos accounted for almost 1% of approximately 19000 pathology reports on file, (7) Ding et al reported foreign body granuloma in the sub mental region due to fish bone. (8) Although foreign body reactions are commonly associated with trauma related events, it is important to investigate and evaluate them with utmost care. A proper history, clinical evaluation and the appropriate investigation will help us in diagnosis and treatment of these conditions with accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%