2019
DOI: 10.1002/ped4.12149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign body ingestion in an infant: A high index of suspicion is required

Abstract: Introduction The incidence of foreign body ingestion in the upper gastrointestinal tract accounts for 75%–85% of foreign body ingestions in pediatric patients. Case presentation An 8‐month old boy presented with vomiting and was referred to the otorhinolaryngology team based on his mother's suspicion that her child might have ingested a foreign body. Flexible laryngoscopy revealed a phone screen protector at the vallecular region. The foreign body was removed in the operating theatre. Conclusion Foreign body i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FB ingestion is often a difficult diagnosis in the paediatric population. [ 9 ] The ingestion may not be witnessed by the caregiver and small children may not vocalise: a high index of suspicion is therefore required to make a diagnosis. Many cases of FB ingestion are not brought to medical attention probably because most of the foreign bodies are passed spontaneously in stool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FB ingestion is often a difficult diagnosis in the paediatric population. [ 9 ] The ingestion may not be witnessed by the caregiver and small children may not vocalise: a high index of suspicion is therefore required to make a diagnosis. Many cases of FB ingestion are not brought to medical attention probably because most of the foreign bodies are passed spontaneously in stool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was manifested in prior studies that FB deposition in duodenal loop was extremely rare although could be severely catastrophic [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] . Although some authors claimed of that ingestion of FB was asymptomatic in over 55% of cases, opponents reported vomiting, drooling, nausea, sensation of FB, pain, dysphagia, hematemesis, stridor, cough, wheezing, organ perforation, and even death could be seen in most cases [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] . Logically presentation of any specific symptom is directed to anatomical region of lodgment [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the diagnosis is suspected the next step is radiologic study. Routinely plain x-ray roentgenogram study of neck, chest, and abdominopelvic areas could illustrate the lodgment zone of ingested FB if it is not radiolucent [8] , [9] , [17] . Clinical management of whether ingested or aspirated FB related to passed time of ingestion, type of FB, symptoms, and age of the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Objects were retrieved by video-flexible endoscope using rath tooth forceps under sedation. Ishak et al 33 detected a piece of phone screen protector, suspended at the vallecular region of an eight-month infant. The FB as a radiolucent object could not be tressed by X-Ray imaging.…”
Section: Reported Spontaneousmentioning
confidence: 99%