2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-0974-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign body reaction in vaginally eroded and noneroded polypropylene suburethral slings in the female: a case series

Abstract: This is the first study comparing reaction around eroded and noneroded MPPMs and indicates a more intense tissue reaction around eroded mesh, when compared to noneroded material. More studies are needed to prove whether the detected foreign body reaction was the actual trigger for the erosion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, it was proved the fact that polypropylene integrates very well in human tissues, producing reduced reactions of rejection or of inflammations due to foreign body. [6,7] Certain studies proved the fact that, after introducing the polypropylene prosthesis within the human organism, on the abdominal wall, at the level of the place of implantation an initial local inflammation with a reduced fibroblastic reaction is produced, and in time a resistant scar is produced [8]. It was also demonstrated the fact that, compared to other heterologous materials placed at the level of the human tissue, the inflammatory reaction induced by polypropylene is considerably reduced [9,10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, it was proved the fact that polypropylene integrates very well in human tissues, producing reduced reactions of rejection or of inflammations due to foreign body. [6,7] Certain studies proved the fact that, after introducing the polypropylene prosthesis within the human organism, on the abdominal wall, at the level of the place of implantation an initial local inflammation with a reduced fibroblastic reaction is produced, and in time a resistant scar is produced [8]. It was also demonstrated the fact that, compared to other heterologous materials placed at the level of the human tissue, the inflammatory reaction induced by polypropylene is considerably reduced [9,10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maybe, it already is the strain applied during placement that is responsible for the doubling of the textile, which can frequently be seen when investigating explanted meshes histologically. 19,20 The relevance of structural stability of course has to be defined by further studies, but there is a undisputable need for the adoption of the textile characteristic of pelvic floor implants to the special requirements of application and technique, not necessarily following the tension free conditions of hernia surgery. However, the present study offers a first characterization of textile pelvic floor implants under unixial mechanical stress, which may allow a better relation to clinical results as standard testing of effective porosity without any tension can do, 17 and in future might help to improve devices for this specific surgical procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our project went one step further and proved that the architectural features of polypropylene meshes have no impact on histological tissue responses in a 1-year period. The nature and intensity of inflammatory reactions may be critical for acceptance or rejection, and could subsequently influence mechanical properties as well as sling efficacy [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%