1992
DOI: 10.1080/02690949208726139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign direct investment in the West Midlands: An analysis and evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason for this is that foreign subsidiaries tend to purchase fairly low proportions of issue was the report by PA Cambridge Economic Consultants (PACEC, 1995), which used the same their inputs from host regions, especially when compared with domestic firms (LEVER, 1974;STEWART, database as this paper. That report documented foreign investor impacts on a number of supplier practices, 1976;MCALEESE and MCDONALD, 1978;COLLIS and ROBERTS, 1992;TUROK, 1993;POTTER, in particular productive processes, delivery methods and product development activities, with knock-on 1995a; PHELPS, 1997;GORG and RUANE, 1998;BRAND et al, 2000;CRONE, 2000). This appears to impacts to supplier competitiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…One reason for this is that foreign subsidiaries tend to purchase fairly low proportions of issue was the report by PA Cambridge Economic Consultants (PACEC, 1995), which used the same their inputs from host regions, especially when compared with domestic firms (LEVER, 1974;STEWART, database as this paper. That report documented foreign investor impacts on a number of supplier practices, 1976;MCALEESE and MCDONALD, 1978;COLLIS and ROBERTS, 1992;TUROK, 1993;POTTER, in particular productive processes, delivery methods and product development activities, with knock-on 1995a; PHELPS, 1997;GORG and RUANE, 1998;BRAND et al, 2000;CRONE, 2000). This appears to impacts to supplier competitiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the United Kingdom, the influence of foreign multinationals (MNEs) over regional economies is arguably greater than ever following unprecedented flows of inward FDI in the late 1980s and 1990s (Christodoulou, 1996;Dicken, 1992;OECD, 1992). Over the past decade several authors have sought to evaluate the impact of inward FDI on specific UK regions [for example, Collis and Roberts (1992), on the West Midlands; Gripaios and Gripaios (1993), on Plymouth; Hill and Munday (1991), on Wales; Smith and Stone (1989), on the Northern region]. The evidence from these and other studies is that inward FDI can bring benefits to a region including direct and indirect employment creation, the modernisation of industrial structures, and positive`demonstration effects' on local firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of local sourcing by foreign MNEs has also received considerable coverage in more recent times. For example, Collis and Roberts's (1992) study of FDI in the West Midlands measured the extent of local linkages at foreign MNE plants, as well as other impacts on the host economy. In his widely cited paper, Turok (1993) investigated the local linkages of foreign investors in the Scottish electronics sector, and Gorg and Ruane (2001) recently examined the extent of local backward linkages in the electronics sector in Ireland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 1980s, the South East and Scotland, for example, each attracted more than four times as many foreign investment projects as the South West region. By comparing a region's share of new FDI with its share of UK employment, Hill and Munday also found that the West Midlands, the Northern region, Scotland and Wales have not only got the largest concentrations of foreign investment already, but also that these regions have increased their share of the rising number of investments (see also Bachtler and Clement, 1991;Collis and Roberts, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%