Foreign disinformation operation's affective engagement: Valence versus discrete emotions as drivers of tweet popularity

Abstract

Twitter's 2018 release of its data corpus on Iran‐ and Russia‐backed accounts provided an opportunity to examine whether emotion‐laden tweets reached a wider audience than nonemotional tweets in the first large‐scale attempt to interfere in the US presidential election in 2016. We contrasted the dimensional and discrete theories of emotion by comparing tweets’ virality as a function of their valence or discrete emotional content. While both perspectives were supported by the popularity of positive and joyful tweets, the unpopularity of negative and fearful tweets uniquely supported the discrete view. The robustness of this theoretically insightful finding was checked by applying a set of keywords from the Department of Homeland Security to identify tweets that were both negative and fear‐evoking. Iranian and Russian disinformation operatives seemed unaware of negative and fearful tweets’ unpopularity and composed most posts with these sentiments. This study's findings explored the digital extensions of two emotion theories and balanced the prevailing media reporting on foreign disinformation operations’ sophistication.

Information Trolls and Democracy: A Qualitative Examination of Disinformation Campaigns in Canada

“…Exploiting emotions to increase the effectiveness of a TFD campaign is a common feature within information warfare. Posts that elicit an emotional response capture the attention of more users and spread more quickly and widely (Cheung-Blunden et al, 2021). Emotional manipulation used in politically targeted TFD campaigns impacts citizens' abilities to make democratic decisions that aren't influenced by nefarious external actors.…”

“…Given the vast amount of research that indicates the presence of emotional manipulation in TFD (Barclay, 2018;Haataja, 2019;Sopilko et al, 2022;Cheung-Blunden et al, 2021;Manfredi, Amado, & Gomez-Iniesta, 2022), the emotional content seen within the articles is understandable. When false narratives are presented in a way that encourages outrage, the reader's guard drops, and the desire to think critically becomes reduced (Barclay, 2018).…”

Disinformation ‘gatecrashes’ tourism: An empirical study

“…Foreign entities may engage in disinformation operations within a country; however, the sophistication of these operations may differ from nation to nation. Prior studies, for example, draw parallels between the exceedingly sophisticated Russian disinformation tactics and the somewhat less skilled Iranian initiatives, which garnered less Twitter engagement than the Russian campaigns (Cheung-Blunden et al, 2021). Foreign disinformation campaigns may also stem from domestic propaganda and state policy goals (Weiss, 2020).…”

An Evaluation Study in Social Media Research: Key Aspects to Enhancing the Promotion of Efficient Organizations on Twitter

“…The study developed a clustering algorithm that achieved better results than other clustering algorithms. After Twitter released its data corpus on Iran-and Russia-backed accounts, Cheung et al [38] explored whether emotion-laden tweets reach a wider audience than non-emotional tweets. They found that practical implications vary across people and professions, including those targeting emotions to attain influence, and those subject to such attempts.…”