2015
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2015.1083085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign exchange reserve adequacy and exogenous shocks

Abstract: One of the traditional benchmarks in international macroeconomics is that a country should maintain reserves that can cover at least 12 weeks of imports. The notion of reserve adequacy, however, is not static and is intimately associated with the occurrence of financial crises as well as exogenous shocks, with many observers using the reduction in reserves below this benchmark as a sign of fragility. This article provides a benefit-cost type approach to evaluating reserve adequacy. The benefits of holding rese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strategy includes risks other than inflation, such as additional costs, monetary imbalances, overheating in credit and asset markets, and potential problems in the banking sector. Moore and Glean (2016) research exchange reserve adequacy using a cost-benefit approach, starting with the common assumption that the optimal level of reserves is 12 weeks of imports. They use a dynamic random effects probit model of financial crises to evaluate the benefits and a panel growth equation to determine the costs.…”
Section: Brief Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This strategy includes risks other than inflation, such as additional costs, monetary imbalances, overheating in credit and asset markets, and potential problems in the banking sector. Moore and Glean (2016) research exchange reserve adequacy using a cost-benefit approach, starting with the common assumption that the optimal level of reserves is 12 weeks of imports. They use a dynamic random effects probit model of financial crises to evaluate the benefits and a panel growth equation to determine the costs.…”
Section: Brief Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we still know nothing about the adequacy of foreign exchange reserves. To shed some light on this we use Equation (2) in the research data and methodology section of this paper, while recognising that the international economics literature often assumes that a country should maintain sufficient reserves to cover at least onequarter of imports (Moore and Glean 2016). The results for the case of Serbia are provided in Figure 1.…”
Section: Determinants Of Fx Reservesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The source of these funds comes from the country's foreign exchange reserves, which is an important aspect of seeing how far the country is in carrying out international trade and shows how strong a country's economy is. The accumulation of large foreign exchange reserves is one of the things used by developing countries to balancing effect of macroeconomic dynamics (Moore & Glean, 2016). The effectiveness of storing large foreign exchange reserves increases the resilience of the country,s economy against shocks that occur anytime (Allegret , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the competitiveness benefit of holding reserves may reduce the effective cost of hoarding reserves and induce governments to prefer reserve-hoarding over the alternative. Moore and Glean (2016) asserts that the notion of reserve adequacy is not static and is intimately associated with the occurrence of financial crises as well as exogenous shocks. The traditional benchmarks in international macroeconomics is that a country should maintain reserves that can cover at least three (3) months of imports.…”
Section: The Emp Index and The Reserves Adjuster Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%