2003
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1532872100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning

Abstract: Infants acquire language with remarkable speed, although little is known about the mechanisms that underlie the acquisition process. Studies of the phonetic units of language have shown that early in life, infants are capable of discerning differences among the phonetic units of all languages, including native-and foreignlanguage sounds. Between 6 and 12 mo of age, the ability to discriminate foreign-language phonetic units sharply declines. In two studies, we investigate the necessary and sufficient condition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

44
744
5
16

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 944 publications
(809 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
44
744
5
16
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that such findings reflect infants' ability to detect the goal structure of action following several minutes of intervention experience engaging in object-directed behavior, and to subsequently apply this knowledge to their perception of the actions of others. Thus, our findings add to the body of literature on rapid learning in young infants (Saffran, Aslin, & Newport, 1996;Marcus, Vijayan, Bandi Rao, & Vishton, 1999;Kuhl, Tsao, & Liue, 2003), provide empirical support for the role of active experience in learning (Piaget, 1953), and add to the growing record documenting relations between agentive experience and other aspects of cognitive development in infancy (Needham et al, 2002;Eppler, 1995;Needham, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We suggest that such findings reflect infants' ability to detect the goal structure of action following several minutes of intervention experience engaging in object-directed behavior, and to subsequently apply this knowledge to their perception of the actions of others. Thus, our findings add to the body of literature on rapid learning in young infants (Saffran, Aslin, & Newport, 1996;Marcus, Vijayan, Bandi Rao, & Vishton, 1999;Kuhl, Tsao, & Liue, 2003), provide empirical support for the role of active experience in learning (Piaget, 1953), and add to the growing record documenting relations between agentive experience and other aspects of cognitive development in infancy (Needham et al, 2002;Eppler, 1995;Needham, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Behavioral evidence, however, from both adults (e.g. Okita et al, 2007;Laidlaw et al, 2011) and children (Kuhl et al, 2003;Goldstein and Schwade, 2008;Kirschner and Tomasello, 2009) suggests that live, interactive context significantly alters response to otherwise matched social stimuli. Adult neuroimaging research has begun to identify the neural bases of social interaction (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this time, laboratory experiments indicate that distributional and statistical learning can occur with just two minutes' exposure to novel speech material (e.g., Maye, Werker, and Gerken 2002;Saffran, Aslin, and Newport 1996). However, studies have also shown strong social influences in their investigations of whether infants are capable of phonetic learning at 9 months of age from natural first-time exposure to a foreign language (Conboy and Kuhl 2011;Kuhl, Tsao, and Liu 2003). Kuhl and colleagues (Kuhl, Tsao, and Liu 2003), in a foreign-language intervention experiment, exposed 9-month-old infants to Mandarin Chinese, a language with prosodic and phonetic structure very different from English.…”
Section: Social Influences On Phonetic Learning During the Sensitivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to accurately and efficiently process complex speech sounds is critical in language development as speech processing in infants can Following this growing literature, we examined the rich experience of music training in an even earlier developmental stage (9 months of age) for both theoretical and methodological reasons (Zhao and Kuhl 2016). Theoretically, this approach allowed us to compare the effects of music experience during the sensitive period of phonetic learning to other previously studied experiences, such as experience of a foreign language (Kuhl, Tsao, and Liu 2003). Methodologically, (1) we were able to randomly assign infants at this age to complete either a structured laboratory-controlled music intervention (Intervention) or control activities (Control).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%