2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5791-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic age estimation for pelvic X-ray images using deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is considerable interest in accelerating identification procedures, and experts are involved in machine learning in forensic procedures. They use X-ray images [108][109][110][111][112][113], MRI images [107,114], photography [115][116][117], CT scans [118][119][120][121][122][123] of the head or other bones such as the collarbone, femur, teeth, etc. and use databases to teach artificial intelligence to identify people's age or gender.…”
Section: Overview Of Used Artificial Intelligence For Forensic Age and Sex Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable interest in accelerating identification procedures, and experts are involved in machine learning in forensic procedures. They use X-ray images [108][109][110][111][112][113], MRI images [107,114], photography [115][116][117], CT scans [118][119][120][121][122][123] of the head or other bones such as the collarbone, femur, teeth, etc. and use databases to teach artificial intelligence to identify people's age or gender.…”
Section: Overview Of Used Artificial Intelligence For Forensic Age and Sex Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iliac crest apophysis provides an excellent subject for the application of forensic age diagnostics to the living, particularly for determining age thresholds of 14, 16 and 18 years. For this reason, Li et al [113] developed a DL system to perform automatic bone age estimation based on 1875 clinical X-ray pelvic radiological images, particularly for individuals between 10 and 25 years old. It can handle all possible cases of automated skeletal bone age assessment, even for samples from individuals of 19, 20, and 21 years old.…”
Section: Age Estimation From Skeletal Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the currently reported use of ML in forensic post-mortem imaging, it is in its infancy. ML has only been trialed in a few specific forensic applications including automatic forensic dental identification [ 36 ]; sex determination [ [37] , [38] , [39] ]; the automation of bone age assessment [ 40 , 41 ]; prediction of bone fractures [ 42 ]; and the automatic detection of hemorrhagic pericardial effusion [ 43 ]. As far as we are aware, none of these studies has translated into daily forensic practice, despite the potential to streamline case-work.…”
Section: Forensic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of this work included the requirement for age-relevant anatomical information, which implies a labor-intensive pre-processing step, and decreased accuracy for cases with biological ages greater than 18 years. In an alternative approach, Li et al [ 41 ] utilized pelvic X-ray images and a DCNN to create a bone age assessment pipeline which yielded a mean error of 0.94 years, 0.36 years better than the existing reference standard. This work used transfer learning from a CNN pre-trained on the ImageNet database [ 44 ], achieving an appropriate accuracy for this type of input data.…”
Section: Forensic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%