2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/4265753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic Age Estimation of Chinese Malaysian Adults by Evaluating Occlusal Tooth Wear Using Modified Kim’s Index

Abstract: Background and Objective Evaluation of dental attrition is an easy and relatively accurate approach to estimating the age of an adult either ante- or postmortem for some specific population. Dental attrition represents a progressive physiological age change that can be measured using variety of indices to aid as an adjunct in forensic age estimation. Some of the previously proposed indices have their own practical limitations. This paper focuses on using modified Kim's criteria to score dental attrition to est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several well accepted indices in the literature to measure tooth wear, and to compare different population groups through different indices can lead to wrong conclusions [15]. For example, in Chinese Malaysian and Indian populations, a high correlation was found between tooth wear and age [9,10], similar to that seen in Xingu indigenous populations. Nevertheless, another measurement index was used, in addition to different selection criteria.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several well accepted indices in the literature to measure tooth wear, and to compare different population groups through different indices can lead to wrong conclusions [15]. For example, in Chinese Malaysian and Indian populations, a high correlation was found between tooth wear and age [9,10], similar to that seen in Xingu indigenous populations. Nevertheless, another measurement index was used, in addition to different selection criteria.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Dental wear can be an effective tool for estimating age in different populations [9][10][11]. As dental hard tissues undergo progressive loss due to mechanical and/or chemical wear and are not replaced [12,13], quantifying dental wear to estimate chronological age is valid, especially, after development of the dentition and growth cessation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are other studies evaluating the relationship between tooth wear and AE similar to our study, our findings should not be compared with other studies since different indexes were used in each. [10][11][12] When the literature is reviewed without any sex discrimination, it is stated that morphometric analyses performed on the skeleton provide quick and accurate results. It has been reported that the accuracy rate is increased by 92% when the skull is present, 95% when the pelvis is present, and 98% when both are present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] Dental AE in adults can be determined from age-related pulp chamber narrowing and occlusal surface abrasions. 1,[7][8][9][10][11][12] It has been stated that tooth development is influenced by sex-linked genes and human permanent tooth structures are sexually dimorphic. For this reason, forensic experts have developed many different techniques to differentiate men from female.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies mainly used the technique employed by Miles (n=5), Brothwell (n=4), Murphy's (n=2), Takei (n=1), Dreier FG (n=1), Li and Ji (n=2), Kim (n=2), Modified Kim's Method (n=3), Smith (n=1), Mockers (n=1) and Pot (n=1). [1][2][3]7,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The range of SEE for each study was least to the maximum with "r" values ranging from 0.3 to 0.97. The "r" value was highest in the Chinese population and the least in the urban Brazilian population 1,14 (Table 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%