2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.908346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic characterization of camcorded movies: digital cinema vs. celluloid film prints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where W is the number of pixels per row in a frame of the pirate sample p. Due to its horizontal nature, this operation attenuates the interference from the content while leaving the flicker signal untouched [14,1]. According to the model of the flicker given in Equation (1) To estimate ωt, we therefore record the radial frequency which maximizes the magnitude R[y * , ω] for any arbitrarily selected row y * .…”
Section: Flicker Phase Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where W is the number of pixels per row in a frame of the pirate sample p. Due to its horizontal nature, this operation attenuates the interference from the content while leaving the flicker signal untouched [14,1]. According to the model of the flicker given in Equation (1) To estimate ωt, we therefore record the radial frequency which maximizes the magnitude R[y * , ω] for any arbitrarily selected row y * .…”
Section: Flicker Phase Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is incarnated by typical dark/bright stripes that scroll up/down the pirate video. In prior work, research efforts have been dedicated to detect the presence of such flicker [13,14,11,3]. Indeed, this tell-tale artifact provides clues about the piracy path and can be exploited by the forensic analyst to select which watermark detector to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%