Rosen's Emergency Medicine – Concepts and Clinical Practice 2010
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-05472-0.00062-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic Emergency Medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were also no muzzle imprint marks at any of the three wounds, again consistent with the claim that the wounds were not caused by a contact or a near contact shot [16]. Observations concerning the victim's clothing were more difficult to explain.…”
Section: Case Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…There were also no muzzle imprint marks at any of the three wounds, again consistent with the claim that the wounds were not caused by a contact or a near contact shot [16]. Observations concerning the victim's clothing were more difficult to explain.…”
Section: Case Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…When assessing a bruise (see Table 1), a forensic nurse needs to document its size (length and width), shape, location, color(s), distinction of margins, and whether it is indurated or painful. The bruise should be described as patterned if it demonstrates characteristics similar to the weapon or object that produced it (Smock, 2001). If multiple bruises in various stages of healing are present, then they demonstrate a pattern of injury (Besant-Matthews, 2006;Sheridan, 2007).…”
Section: Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%