2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic experts' perceptions of expert bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a Harvard and MIT study (Brinkerhoff, 2012; Mullainathan, Noeth, & Schoar, 2012), just 21 of 284 brokers contacted by researchers posing as clients recommended investing in index funds, which mirror broader market performance and carry the smallest fees. Lower Stage performers are much more likely to be biased by commissions and instructions (Commons, Miller, Li, & Gutheil, 2012). Their decisions often seem to be biased by how companies for which they work pay them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Harvard and MIT study (Brinkerhoff, 2012; Mullainathan, Noeth, & Schoar, 2012), just 21 of 284 brokers contacted by researchers posing as clients recommended investing in index funds, which mirror broader market performance and carry the smallest fees. Lower Stage performers are much more likely to be biased by commissions and instructions (Commons, Miller, Li, & Gutheil, 2012). Their decisions often seem to be biased by how companies for which they work pay them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nents of what OHC was measuring (Commons, Miller, Li, & Gutheil, 2012). Models of behavioral economic models of decision making (Herrnstein, 1970;Rachlin, 1995) also may serve as an example.…”
Section: Potential Role Of Universal Models Such As Mhc As a Bridge A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Be-cause the task of evaluating these items requires a very high stage, items on the factor 3 loaded less than the items on the first two factors. In Commons, Miller, Li, and Gutheil (2012), they were also rated to be less biasing than the items in factors 1 and 2. Each item will be analyzed in the following:…”
Section: Metasystematic Order 13mentioning
confidence: 99%