2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8757-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic GIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several scholars have studied changes in crime during and after natural disasters, particularly Atlantic hurricanes (Elmes et al 2014). Disasters cause widespread changes to routine activities through deaths, evacuations and disruption of working and leisure patterns, as well as through damage to the physical environment.…”
Section: Existing Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scholars have studied changes in crime during and after natural disasters, particularly Atlantic hurricanes (Elmes et al 2014). Disasters cause widespread changes to routine activities through deaths, evacuations and disruption of working and leisure patterns, as well as through damage to the physical environment.…”
Section: Existing Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the goal for using CFS is to provide a proxy data source for the traditionally-used recorded incident data, little research has been done to test the extent to which CFS could stand in for recorded incidents-especially considering that these data sets are collected with differing goals. Recent examples of research utilizing CFS data include measuring fear of crime, collective efficacy, or other concepts closely tied to measuring police presence or the request for police presence (Alpert, Macdonald, & Dunham, 2005;Boivin & Cordeau, 2011;Conley & Stein, 2014;Junior & Muniz, 2005;Klinger & Bridges, 1997;Levitt, 1998;Nesbary, 1998;Renauer, 2012;Telep, Mitchell, & Weisburd, 2014). However, there remains an underlying question of whether CFS data have the potential to reveal more information related to recorded crime or could serve as a reasonable proxy given the differences between the two datasets.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%