Forensic Linguistics

Mcmenamin, Gerald

doi:10.1201/9781420041170

Cited by 123 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Contrary to popular belief, a forensic linguist's duty is not to perform text analysis with the objective of discovering the writer's intent or describing his/her psychological profile or state (McMenamin, 2002;Solan, 1998). For example, one book that has received a great deal of criticism is Author Unknown: On the Trail of Anonymous (Foster, 2000) because the analysis presented in it is "purely speculative" (Chaski, 2001, p. 3), includes "conclusions based on literary allusion" (Solan & Tiersma, 2005, p. 458) and is "more consistent with literary criticism than linguistic science" (McMenamin, 2002, p. 87).…”

Section: What the Forensic Linguist Doesn't Domentioning

confidence: 98%

“…For example, while Laster (1990) observed that by adding sir and madam markers of politeness, jurors tended to consider the witness more competent and convincing than when they were not. McMenamin (2002) found that making the English version more vulgar than the original (by adding a word like fucking to a phrase that does not contain it) "reflects negatively on the speaker (defendant)" (p. 249).…”

Section: Court Interpretationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Forensic Linguistics: An Overview of the Intersection and Interaction of Language and Law

Correa

2013

StALan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Forensic Linguistics (FL) is a relatively new subfield within applied linguistics that studies the different intersections between language and the legal field, which is heavily linguistic by nature. In order to have a fair, legal and effective procedure, anyone involved in a legal process (lawyers, judges, police officers, members of a jury, etc.) benefits from possessing a certain awareness of linguistic principles. With this purpose, the expert testimony of a linguist could contribute to the understanding or recognition of possible interpretations or points of view that might have gone otherwise unnoticed. This article provides the general linguist with an overview of the broad field of FL and highlights the different ways the discipline can contribute to the criminal justice system. It presents a summary of some of the most well-known and discussed legal cases and outlines the intersections between applied linguistics (mainly pragmatics, discourse analysis, and sociolinguistics) and this emerging field in three interrelated areas: (1) language as the medium of communication between law enforcement authorities and suspects/witnesses or as the medium of legal argumentation in the courtroom, (2) language of the law (issues of intelligibility, interpretation and construction of legal language), and (3) crimes of language and linguistic evidence (use, validity, and reliability in the courtroom). Challenges and limitations of the field are also discussed.

show abstract

Section: What the Forensic Linguist Doesn't Domentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Court Interpretationmentioning

confidence: 99%