2016
DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2016.08.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic Linguistics and the Detecting of Deviant Teaching in Malaysia

Abstract: Recently, deviant teaching has become a religious crime because it has been associated with extremist groups promoting violence and killing people in the name of Islam. This paper discusses the importance of forensic linguistics in detecting religious deviant teaching in Malaysia, having the objectives of (1) identifying a text's features that can be used as evidence when detecting deviant teaching, and (2) describing the interpretation of meanings given by the leader of the deviant group. The discussion of fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, there has been a spate of interest in forensic linguistics and much research conducted in the field of forensic linguistics in various areas such as investigation in the police report (Sumaljag, 2018), research about fraud in the Judicial System as a Language Crime (Momeni, 2012), analyzing suicide note cases (Sudjana, 2013), studying bribery case in Indonesia (Waskita, 2014), exploring an authorship identification (Neito et al, 2008), applying Forensic linguistics in detecting of deviant teaching in Malaysia (Nordin, 2016), and reviewed forensic linguistics in the light of crime investigation (Ramezani et al, 2016). As a result, no study investigated an international murder case broadcasted in Media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, there has been a spate of interest in forensic linguistics and much research conducted in the field of forensic linguistics in various areas such as investigation in the police report (Sumaljag, 2018), research about fraud in the Judicial System as a Language Crime (Momeni, 2012), analyzing suicide note cases (Sudjana, 2013), studying bribery case in Indonesia (Waskita, 2014), exploring an authorship identification (Neito et al, 2008), applying Forensic linguistics in detecting of deviant teaching in Malaysia (Nordin, 2016), and reviewed forensic linguistics in the light of crime investigation (Ramezani et al, 2016). As a result, no study investigated an international murder case broadcasted in Media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%