Forensic psychologists’ perceptions of bias and potential correction strategies in forensic mental health evaluations.

Abstract

A qualitative study with 20 board-certified forensic psychologists was followed up by a mail survey of 351 forensic psychologists in this mixed-methods investigation of examiner bias awareness and strategies used to debias forensic judgments. Rich qualitative data emerged about awareness of bias, specific biasing situations that recur in forensic evaluations, and potential debiasing strategies. The continuum of bias awareness in forensic evaluators mapped cogently onto the "stages of change" model. Evaluators perceived themselves as less vulnerable to bias than their colleagues, consistent with the phenomenon called the "bias blind spot." Recurring situations that posed challenges for forensic clinicians included disliking or feeling sympathy for the defendant, disgust or anger toward the offense, limited cultural competency, preexisting values, colleagues' influences, and protecting referral streams. Twenty-five debiasing strategies emerged in the qualitative study, all but one of which rated as highly useful in the quantitative survey. Some of those strategies are consistent with empirical evidence about their effectiveness, but others have been shown to be ineffective. We identified which strategies do not help, focused on promising strategies with empirical support, discussed additional promising strategies not mentioned by participants, and described new strategies generated by these participants that have not yet been subjected to empirical examination.Finally, debiasing strategies were considered with respect to future directions for research and forensic practice.

If It Walks Like a Duck: a Case of Confirmatory Bias

“…Completely eliminating confirmatory bias is possible only in science fiction novels, but taking responsible, practical measures to reduce it is an attainable aspiration (see Neal & Brodsky, 2016;Neal & Grisso, 2014a, 2014bWills 2008). Organizational tools such as checklists, timelines, concordances, and activity logs may often be helpful in highlighting inconsistencies and holes in the data.…”

Concepts, Controversies And Conundrums Of “Alienation:” Lessons Learned In A Decade And Reflections On Challenges Ahead

“…Remarkably, even after professionals have been educated about the numerous and prevalent cognitive biases that operate on a daily basis, they continue to be more inclined to recognize cognitive biases in others, though less so in themselves, this being known as the bias blind spot (Neal & Brodsky, ; Pronin, Lin, & Ross, ). It is apparent that some call out others for various logical fallacies or biases, seemingly without appreciation for the fact that the manner in which they do so, amounts to that which they are critical of the other for doing– the pot calling the kettle black.…”

The developing significance of context and function: Neuroscience and law

“…Evaluator bias, both explicit and implicit, is a key problem of ahistorical, non-contextual assessment (Iudici, Salvini, Faccio, & Castelnuovo, 2015), even when evaluators believe that they are bias free (Neal & Brodsky, 2016). For instance, in one federal capital case, an evaluator repeatedly asked the defendant during a psychiatric interview why he took his jacket off prior to shooting someone.…”