Foresights from the Swedish Kitchen: Four Circular Value Opportunities for the Built Environment

Abstract

This paper examines the kitchen as one relevant part of the home that is highly affected by frequent replacements, renovations, and a short service life. The aim is to discern circular value opportunities for the built environment by examining stakeholder activities and the value proposition associated with Swedish kitchens. The paper answers the research question ‘Which aspects in stakeholders’ value proposition of kitchens might contribute to future circular housing design?’. The empirical material was collected through a workshop, interviews, and a focus group session. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis while applying value mapping as an analytical framework. Four opportunities for circularity were identified: (1) aligning spatial and product design for a circular economy, (2) considering end-user perspectives and demands, (3) formulating regulations informed by research, and (4) developing circular products and services through collaboration. While some of these opportunities have already been emphasised in previous literature, the most distinct contribution of this paper is that it reveals the importance of spatial parameters when transitioning towards a circular housing design. The methods and results of this paper may be adapted to various building components to create a system-level circular economy in the built environment.

A review of circular economy models and success factors on public-private partnership infrastructure development

“…3.2.1 Circular economy models for PPP infrastructure projects. The traditional business model focuses on maximizing economic benefits while overlooking social and environmental benefits (Oll ar et al, 2020). The adoption of the CE is a win-win solution, and considering three pillars of sustainability (economic, social and environmental) is fundamental (Sani et al, 2021).…”

Design for Circularity: The Case of the Building Construction Industry

“…These stakeholders may either be participants, who are having a financial interest or a non-financial interest in the project [5]. Ollár et al [21] further argue that public should also be included as a stakeholder category when it comes to CE as they may have a nonfinancial interest in terms of environmental or social dimensions. Hence, the inception of DfC could be characterised in terms of '5 A's'.…”

Evaluating the cascading‐use of wood furniture: How value‐retention processes can contribute to material efficiency and circularity

“…Media publications have also noted that the growth of fast furniture may be driven by the same factors behind fast fashion: Products tend to be of lower quality, made from lower‐cost materials; they are sold for lower prices with relatively higher profit margins; and they are purchased and disposed of by consumers at increasingly faster replacement rates (Bischof, 2019; Rauturier, 2020). Many of these options are made from wood‐based composite materials, such as fiberboard, that are relatively more difficult to maintain and/or recycle (Cooper et al., 2021; Ollár et al., 2020). Increasing visibility and awareness of “fast furniture” through mass media attention has contributed to concerns about the quantity of waste wood furniture disposed into landfills each year (Bischof, 2019; Cummins, 2020).…”