1989
DOI: 10.2307/1368115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest Characteristics Related to Pileated Woodpecker Territory Size in Missouri

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Conner et al (1975) suggested that retained standing dead and dying trees serve both as foraging and nesting substrates. Renken and Wiggers (1989) suggested that logging slash can serve as foraging substrate for pileated woodpeckers, and that harvested sites can have elevated amounts of insect prey (Conner and Crawford, 1974). The long-term response of woodpeckers to these changes in habitat structure remains unknown, and elevated prey levels may be ephemeral.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conner et al (1975) suggested that retained standing dead and dying trees serve both as foraging and nesting substrates. Renken and Wiggers (1989) suggested that logging slash can serve as foraging substrate for pileated woodpeckers, and that harvested sites can have elevated amounts of insect prey (Conner and Crawford, 1974). The long-term response of woodpeckers to these changes in habitat structure remains unknown, and elevated prey levels may be ephemeral.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snag density was generally associated with woodpecker abundance and could be an important structural cue used by woodpeckers (Renken and Wiggers 1989;Bull and Holthausen 1993). In mixed Nothofagus stands N. pumilio use is greater than N. betuloides use, suggesting that woodpeckers selected this tree species.…”
Section: Woodpecker Foraging and Habitatmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The conditions suitable for insect infestion of the heartwood is likely a result of long-term decay, as well as larger trees (>44 cm dbh) having a more suitable microclimates for insects (greater moisture retention; Renken and Wiggers, 1993) and the fact that larger trees remain standing longer (Vanderwel et al, in press).…”
Section: Feeding Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%