2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest conservation, wood production intensification and leakage: An Australian case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing difference in classifier performance may be attributed to the difficulty in discriminating between the plantation forests and native forests classes: user's accuracy decreased by 0.078 for native forest from 1979 to 2014 for the SVM classifier, whereas producer accuracy for plantation forests decreased from 0.829 in 1992 to 0.691 in 2014 as the plantations from the 1990s matured (with similar trends in classification success over time for CART and RF; Table 6). This pattern of LULC changes is consistent with the introduction of the Plantation for Australia -The 2020 Vision in 1997 and The Federal Managed Investments Act of 1998, which were both supported by a favourable federal government tax treatment, termed the Management Investment Schemes (MIS) (Warman & Nelson, 2016). The 2020 Vision included a goal for a threefold increase in plantation area by 2020 in Australia.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The increasing difference in classifier performance may be attributed to the difficulty in discriminating between the plantation forests and native forests classes: user's accuracy decreased by 0.078 for native forest from 1979 to 2014 for the SVM classifier, whereas producer accuracy for plantation forests decreased from 0.829 in 1992 to 0.691 in 2014 as the plantations from the 1990s matured (with similar trends in classification success over time for CART and RF; Table 6). This pattern of LULC changes is consistent with the introduction of the Plantation for Australia -The 2020 Vision in 1997 and The Federal Managed Investments Act of 1998, which were both supported by a favourable federal government tax treatment, termed the Management Investment Schemes (MIS) (Warman & Nelson, 2016). The 2020 Vision included a goal for a threefold increase in plantation area by 2020 in Australia.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…More specifically, when all other factors are constant, net wood imports could lower pressures on domestic forests, while net wood exports could increase them (Kastner et al 2011). This phenomenon of inadvertently shifting impacts elsewhere is often referred to as "leakage" or "displacement" in the literature (Warman and Nelson 2016). Economic globalization may facilitate nationalscale forest transitions through the displacement of deforestation overseas (Meyfroidt and Lambin 2009), and thus decrease the regional and global environmental benefits of policies and schemes aimed at conserving local forest ecosystems (Meyfroidt et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While research in Australia has demonstrated plantation forestry to be associated with a range of both positive and negative social, environmental and economic impacts (e.g. Warman & Nelson, 2016;Mercer & Underwood, 2002;Schirmer, 2000;Schirmer & Kanowski, 2001;Williams, 2014), the visual appearance of large scale plantation forestry is consistently identified as a cause for community concern (e.g. Fléchard, Carroll, Cohn, & Ní Dhubháin, 2007;Karjalainen, 2006;Tyrväinen & Tahvanainen, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%