2017
DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyx103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest cover influences occurrence of mammalian carnivores within Brazilian Atlantic Forest

Abstract: Habitat fragmentation reduces biodiversity and affects ecological processes that are fundamental for maintaining ecosystem services. We investigated how landscape structure-percent forest cover, patch density, percent cover by edge, perimeter-area ratio, and spatial heterogeneity-affects the diversity of mammalian carnivores at multiple extents within 22 Atlantic Forest landscapes. We hypothesized that 1) species richness of carnivores is positively related to forest cover; and 2) the occurrence of species wil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
2
11

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
33
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the geographic coordinates of each site, expressed as a UTM projection (Datum WGS 84), we extracted data on the human development index (HDI: United Nations Development Program) within a 10-km buffer area (~31,060 ha) around each site using the mean area-weighed HDI and per capita income (USD) values for all neighboring municipal counties, on the basis of the Brazilian Atlas of Human Development [ 68 ]. These buffers were defined as five times the buffer area used to assess the effects of landscape cover on mammalian carnivores in the Atlantic Forest [ 69 ]. Next, based on the ‘SOS Mata Atlântica’ land cover maps [ 70 ], assuming the 2016 landscape cover as a proxy for all studies, we extracted the following land cover data for each 10-km buffer area: (1) native vegetation cover (NC): sum of all natural vegetation types; (2) largest fragment area (LF): largest remnant of natural vegetation; (3) anthropogenic habitat cover (AC): sum of all areas allocated to agriculture, livestock pastures and exotic tree plantations (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the geographic coordinates of each site, expressed as a UTM projection (Datum WGS 84), we extracted data on the human development index (HDI: United Nations Development Program) within a 10-km buffer area (~31,060 ha) around each site using the mean area-weighed HDI and per capita income (USD) values for all neighboring municipal counties, on the basis of the Brazilian Atlas of Human Development [ 68 ]. These buffers were defined as five times the buffer area used to assess the effects of landscape cover on mammalian carnivores in the Atlantic Forest [ 69 ]. Next, based on the ‘SOS Mata Atlântica’ land cover maps [ 70 ], assuming the 2016 landscape cover as a proxy for all studies, we extracted the following land cover data for each 10-km buffer area: (1) native vegetation cover (NC): sum of all natural vegetation types; (2) largest fragment area (LF): largest remnant of natural vegetation; (3) anthropogenic habitat cover (AC): sum of all areas allocated to agriculture, livestock pastures and exotic tree plantations (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 10-km buffers were defined as five times the buffer area used to assess the effects of landscape cover on mammalian carnivores in the Atlantic Forest (Regolin et al 2017). These 10-km buffers were defined as five times the buffer area used to assess the effects of landscape cover on mammalian carnivores in the Atlantic Forest (Regolin et al 2017).…”
Section: Co-variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in landscape structure, such as habitat amount, edge effect and heterogeneity, can affect essential ecological processes such as dispersal (Corlett, 2017;Bovo et al, 2018), seed predation (Mendes et al, 2016), and pollination (Hadley and Betts, 2011;Duarte et al, 2018), and consequently compromise population persistence (Santos et al, 2016;Regolin et al, 2017). Landscape changes may also affect population connectivity and genetic diversity in different taxa (e.g., Dixo et al, 2009;Carvalho et al, 2015;Jackson and Fahrig, 2016;Moraes et al, 2018;González-Fernández et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%