1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0755(1998110)8:6<745::aid-aqc310>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest drainage: a threat to benthic biodiversity of boreal headwater streams?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the aquatic effects of ditch cleaning/supplementary ditching are similar to those of first-time drainage (Manninen 1998), in the (near) future there will be a continuous supply of additional alkalinity from the forested areas. However, while pushing the pH towards more neutral values, the forest-ditching operations have several other clearly negative aquatic and ecological impacts (Heikurainen et al 1978, Vuori et al 1998, Ahtiainen and Huttunen 1999, Joensuu et al 1999) and can therefore not be recommended as an acid-combating tool.…”
Section: The Futuresupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Since the aquatic effects of ditch cleaning/supplementary ditching are similar to those of first-time drainage (Manninen 1998), in the (near) future there will be a continuous supply of additional alkalinity from the forested areas. However, while pushing the pH towards more neutral values, the forest-ditching operations have several other clearly negative aquatic and ecological impacts (Heikurainen et al 1978, Vuori et al 1998, Ahtiainen and Huttunen 1999, Joensuu et al 1999) and can therefore not be recommended as an acid-combating tool.…”
Section: The Futuresupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Artificial peatland drainage to improve forest growth is a common practice in Finland (Vuori et al. ) and several other European countries (Holden et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the catchments of these streams included only forest and marshland, the negative effect of peatland alone may also explain this relationship. Vuori, Joensuu, Latvala, Jutila & Ahvonen (1998) found a negative correlation between water pH and peatland abundance in catchments draining troutless streams. The impact of polyhumic water on fish may be caused by episodes of low pH and high concentrations of iron and aluminium, which may be detrimental to the reproduction of trout (Vuorinen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1998). Because the lowest pH values often occur during the spring flood (Vuori et al . 1998), in streams where trout populations still exist the impact of acid water may be expressed indirectly by the proportion of peatland rather than directly by pH values measured in summer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%