2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88307-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
539
8
89

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 762 publications
(646 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
539
8
89
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to take into account the spatial distribution of trees, the Clark-Evans aggregation index (R), the spatial size differentiation index for DBH (TD) and height (TH) and the spatial species mingling index (SM) were calculated. the mathematical formulas of each index are presented in Table 4. Species diversity index (H gat ) has a greater value when a higher number of species is present in an area and their proportions are more balanced (Brzeziecki, 2002;Pretzsch 2010). If a stand is made up of one species, the index H gat is equal to 0, whereas its maximum value H max , specifying the maximum diversity of tree species, is equal to ln(S), where S is the number of species.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to take into account the spatial distribution of trees, the Clark-Evans aggregation index (R), the spatial size differentiation index for DBH (TD) and height (TH) and the spatial species mingling index (SM) were calculated. the mathematical formulas of each index are presented in Table 4. Species diversity index (H gat ) has a greater value when a higher number of species is present in an area and their proportions are more balanced (Brzeziecki, 2002;Pretzsch 2010). If a stand is made up of one species, the index H gat is equal to 0, whereas its maximum value H max , specifying the maximum diversity of tree species, is equal to ln(S), where S is the number of species.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stand structure is affected by both external factors (natural disturbances, such as fires and insect infestations) and internal ones (ecological processes, biological and ecological species characteristics, microhabitat variability, etc.) (Müller et al 2000;Montes et al 2004;Zenner 2004;Pretzsch 2010;Petritan et al 2012;Petritan et al 2015;Zenner et al 2014;del rio et al 2015;Fibich et al 2016). In managed forests, an additional factor significantly influencing the stand structure in various stages of development is silvicultural practices (Pretzsch, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, comparative analyses of demographic performance of species with contrasting sexual systems in diverse forests at different successional stages are lacking. Further, compared with later successional stages, forest communities in early succession are usually dominated by faster‐growing species and have higher mortality and recruitment, and strongly limited by N and water available (Milton, Laca, & Demment, 1994; Pretzsch, 2009). However, many successional effects cannot be detected if the studies are confined solely to stands of older or younger forest (Milton et al., 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processbased growth models consist of functions that describe the interactions between trees and their environment, as such, they can represent changes in growth patterns based on changes in the climatic condition (e.g. Kurz et al, 2009;Landsberg and Waring, 1997;Pretzsch, 2010). Several processbased growth models have been developed and are utilized for revealing good forest management practices (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%