2020
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2020-938
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest Fire Aerosol – Weather Feedbacks over Western North America Using a High-Resolution, Fully Coupled, Air-Quality Model

Abstract: Abstract. The influence of both anthropogenic and forest fire emissions, and their and subsequent chemical and physical processing, on the accuracy of weather and air-quality forecasts, was studied using a high resolution, fully coupled air-quality model. Simulations were carried out for the period 4 July through 5 August 2019, at 2.5-km horizontal grid cell size, over a 2250 x 3425 km2 domain covering western Canada and USA, prior to the use of the forecast system as part of the FIREX-AQ ensemble forecast. Se… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would allow for the transcontinental transport of smoke emissions into the air-quality forecasts for Canada. Efforts are underway to link CFFEPS with a predictive fire-growth model (Anderson et al, 2009) and coupling the impact of smoke plumes generated by CFFEPS on ground temperatures as presented in public forecasts (Makar et al, 2020). Finally, initial steps have begun to link GFFEPS to the Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM5; Swart et al, 2019) and the Canadian fourth generation atmospheric 695 global climate model (CanAM4;von Salzen et al, 2019) for integrated study of climate driven impacts on regional wildfire risks, and air quality analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This would allow for the transcontinental transport of smoke emissions into the air-quality forecasts for Canada. Efforts are underway to link CFFEPS with a predictive fire-growth model (Anderson et al, 2009) and coupling the impact of smoke plumes generated by CFFEPS on ground temperatures as presented in public forecasts (Makar et al, 2020). Finally, initial steps have begun to link GFFEPS to the Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM5; Swart et al, 2019) and the Canadian fourth generation atmospheric 695 global climate model (CanAM4;von Salzen et al, 2019) for integrated study of climate driven impacts on regional wildfire risks, and air quality analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Horse River Fire, 2016) affected New York (Wu et al, 2018) and reached as far as the United Kingdom (Vaughan et al, 2018); similarly, the 2023 wildfires in Quebec were observed to transport across the Atlantic impacting air quality of many European communities. A recent study (Makar et al, 2020) showed the impact of forest fire smoke emissions from Eurasia on North American meteorology and air quality forecasting, 105 highlighting that un-nested continental-only scale air quality models show reduced skill during transoceanic smoke transport events. The impacts of intercontinental pollutant transport have also been demonstrated elsewhere in the literature (e.g., Huang et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Active research is underway towards coupling CFFEPS with GEM-MACH for closer linkages between fire behavior and meteorology, and accounting for the direct and indirect feedbacks between air quality and meteorology (Makar et al, 2020;Ye et al, 2021). These research studies are part of the planned improvements to FireWork operational implementation which also include the introduction of dynamical interaction of plume aerosols with meteorology, hotspot aggregation methods, a data assimilation cycle for atmospheric constituents, and finer resolution domains.…”
Section: Firework Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to gauge the level of significance of the differences between the FB and FB-DMS runs, we computed the 90% confidence interval scores for each of the fields examined. The approach follows Makar et al (2021). Figures 3 and 4 compare the July 2014 mean column-integrated CDNC and LWC, respectively, and Figure 5 shows the column-averaged MMD.…”
Section: Impact Of Dms On Arctic Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%