2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest management effects on downed dead wood at stand and landscape scales in a temperate forest of the central United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every forest ecosystem has dead wood, a dynamic resource that is produced and controlled by factors such as tree productivity, forest type and age, disturbances such as harvesting, windthrow and snow break, and decomposition rates [11,76]. Dead wood plays a key role in ecosystem processes and functions, such as providing habitat for a variety of species, contributing to complexity of forest structure, and influencing fire behavior [77].…”
Section: Dead Woodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every forest ecosystem has dead wood, a dynamic resource that is produced and controlled by factors such as tree productivity, forest type and age, disturbances such as harvesting, windthrow and snow break, and decomposition rates [11,76]. Dead wood plays a key role in ecosystem processes and functions, such as providing habitat for a variety of species, contributing to complexity of forest structure, and influencing fire behavior [77].…”
Section: Dead Woodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every forest ecosystem has dead wood, a dynamic resource that is produced and controlled by factors such as tree productivity, forest type and age, disturbances such as harvesting, windthrow, and snow break, and decomposition rates [10,77]. Dead wood plays a key role in forest ecosystems by providing a habitat for a variety of species, contributing to the complexity of forest structure, and influencing fire behavior [78].…”
Section: No Negative Impact From Dead Woodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of retention harvesting on CWD volume and important piece characteristics for habitat, and the ability of ALS to detect the impacts, were investigated in this thesis. The effects of harvesting on CWD volume have been well studied (Edmonds, Robert L. et al 1986;Spies and Cline 1988;Hansen et al 1991;Caza 1993;McCarthy and Bailey 1994;Sippola et al 1998Sippola et al , 1998Duvall and Grigal 1999;Siitonen et al 2000;Fridman and Walheim 2000;Siitonen 2001;Stokland 2001;Rouvinen et al 2002;Pedlar et al 2002;Fraver et al 2002;Stevenson et al 2006;Moroni 2006;Jönsson and Jonsson 2007;Brassard and Chen 2008;Vanderwel et al 2008;Morrissey et al 2014;Keren and Diaci 2018;Thorn et al 2020;Koivula and Vanha-Majamaa 2020;Wang et al 2021) but there have been few studies on the CWD piece characteristics that create valuable habitat, and on methods of assessing these characteristics over the landscape. In Chapter 1, I analysed the impact of varying amounts of overstory basal area retention: 0% (clearcut), 40%, 70%, 100% (unharvested) on CWD volume, decay class, and inputs from windthrow over 27 years.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%